QMHNX vs. RWSIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX) and Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX).

QMHNX is an actively managed fund by AQR. It was launched on Jul 16, 2013. RWSIX is managed by Redwood. It was launched on Nov 1, 2017.

Performance

QMHNX vs. RWSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX) and Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QMHNX vs. RWSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QMHNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N	14.53%	19.65%	10.48%	-0.40%	49.64%	-2.30%	-0.85%	1.55%	-14.59%	3.43%
RWSIX Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund	-1.83%	-2.43%	-0.64%	8.92%	-6.10%	18.37%	22.40%	11.18%	-3.55%	-6.27%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QMHNX achieves a 14.53% return, which is significantly higher than RWSIX's -1.83% return.

QMHNX

• 1D: -0.61%
• 1M: 2.90%
• YTD: 14.53%
• 6M: 18.99%
• 1Y: 27.38%
• 3Y*: 17.74%
• 5Y*: 16.11%
• 10Y*: 4.76%

RWSIX

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -8.37%
• YTD: -1.83%
• 6M: -1.31%
• 1Y: -1.07%
• 3Y*: -0.39%
• 5Y*: 1.20%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QMHNX vs. RWSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QMHNX has a 4.12% expense ratio, which is higher than RWSIX's 1.30% expense ratio.

QMHNX

AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N

RWSIX

Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund

Return for Risk

QMHNX vs. RWSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QMHNX

QMHNX Risk / Return Rank: 89
QMHNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 92
QMHNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 88
QMHNX Omega Ratio Rank: 85
QMHNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
QMHNX Martin Ratio Rank: 84

RWSIX

RWSIX Risk / Return Rank: 4
RWSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4
RWSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4
RWSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4
RWSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4
RWSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 4

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QMHNX vs. RWSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX) and Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QMHNX	RWSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.98	-0.08	+2.07
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	2.42	-0.03	+2.45
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.36	1.00	+0.36
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.23	-0.22	+3.45
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	8.58	-0.48	+9.06
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QMHNX vs. RWSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QMHNX Sharpe Ratio is 1.98, which is higher than the RWSIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.08. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QMHNX and RWSIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QMHNX	RWSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.98	-0.08	+2.07
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.94	0.10	+0.84
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.31	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.36	0.35	+0.01

Correlation

The correlation between QMHNX and RWSIX is -0.00. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Dividends

QMHNX vs. RWSIX - Dividend Comparison

QMHNX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than RWSIX's 4.59% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QMHNX AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N	1.65%	1.89%	2.09%	7.36%	8.75%	10.64%	7.79%	3.80%	0.00%	0.00%	0.01%	7.47%
RWSIX Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund	4.59%	4.51%	0.00%	10.35%	3.41%	7.81%	7.78%	3.05%	2.51%	0.63%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

QMHNX vs. RWSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QMHNX drawdown since its inception was -40.29%, which is greater than RWSIX's maximum drawdown of -24.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QMHNX and RWSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QMHNX	RWSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-40.29%	-24.90%	-15.39%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.40%	-9.68%	+1.28%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-19.23%	-24.90%	+5.67%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.34%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.61%	-18.29%	+17.68%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.52%	-6.72%	-11.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.16%	4.44%	-1.28%

Volatility

QMHNX vs. RWSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Managed Futures Strategy HV Fund Class N (QMHNX) is 3.99%, while Redwood Systematic Macro Trend ("SMarT") Fund (RWSIX) has a volatility of 4.46%. This indicates that QMHNX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RWSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QMHNX	RWSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.99%	4.46%	-0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.96%	7.43%	+2.53%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.18%	11.44%	+2.74%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	17.21%	12.09%	+5.12%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	15.46%	12.26%	+3.20%