PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLVE vs. VSMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLVE vs. VSMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLVE achieves a 14.69% return, which is significantly higher than VSMV's 7.13% return.


QLVE

1D
0.17%
1M
2.29%
YTD
14.69%
6M
15.11%
1Y
26.17%
3Y*
17.20%
5Y*
6.83%
10Y*

VSMV

1D
-0.41%
1M
-2.76%
YTD
7.13%
6M
6.21%
1Y
22.36%
3Y*
15.58%
5Y*
10.96%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLVE vs. VSMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
14.69%21.87%10.17%8.53%-13.10%0.90%4.16%4.77%
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
7.13%16.77%15.79%12.34%-7.56%25.66%5.05%5.38%

Correlation

The correlation between QLVE and VSMV is 0.50, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.50

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.47

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019

0.52

The correlation between QLVE and VSMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.47 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLVE vs. VSMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QLVE
VSMV

Technology

37.3%
38.1%

Financial Services

15.9%
7.8%

Communication Services

10.7%
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

6.7%
4.9%

Industrials

6.3%
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

6.2%
16.1%

Healthcare

4.6%
14.1%

Energy

4.4%
4.1%

Utilities

4.4%
0.0%

Basic Materials

3.4%
1.6%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.0%

Technology

QLVE
37.3%
VSMV
38.1%

Financial Services

QLVE
15.9%
VSMV
7.8%

Communication Services

QLVE
10.7%
VSMV
5.1%

Consumer Cyclical

QLVE
6.7%
VSMV
4.9%

Industrials

QLVE
6.3%
VSMV
8.2%

Consumer Defensive

QLVE
6.2%
VSMV
16.1%

Healthcare

QLVE
4.6%
VSMV
14.1%

Energy

QLVE
4.4%
VSMV
4.1%

Utilities

QLVE
4.4%
VSMV
0.0%

Basic Materials

QLVE
3.4%
VSMV
1.6%

Real Estate

QLVE
0.1%
VSMV
0.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLVE vs. VSMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLVE
QLVE Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
QLVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLVE Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
QLVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLVE Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

VSMV
VSMV Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
VSMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8484
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VSMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
VSMV Omega Ratio Rank: 8383
Omega Ratio Rank
VSMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
VSMV Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLVE vs. VSMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QLVEVSMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.98

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.44

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.27

4.33

-2.07

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.65

15.91

-7.26

QLVE vs. VSMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLVE Sharpe Ratio is 1.44, which is lower than the VSMV Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLVE and VSMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QLVE vs. VSMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLVE drawdown since its inception was -29.96%, roughly equal to the maximum VSMV drawdown of -31.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVE and VSMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLVEVSMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.96%

-31.33%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.60%

-5.18%

-6.42%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.29%

-13.22%

-0.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.86%

-17.96%

-5.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.10%

-2.99%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.25%

-3.40%

-4.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.03%

1.41%

+1.62%

Volatility

QLVE vs. VSMV - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) has a higher volatility of 9.47% compared to VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF (VSMV) at 3.00%. This indicates that QLVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VSMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLVEVSMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.47%

3.00%

+6.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.96%

6.72%

+10.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.33%

9.29%

+9.04%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.96%

12.88%

+1.08%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.04%

15.02%

+1.02%

QLVE vs. VSMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLVE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than VSMV's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLVE vs. VSMV - Dividend Comparison

QLVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.64%, more than VSMV's 1.38% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.64%3.14%3.11%3.00%2.48%2.57%1.66%1.27%0.00%0.00%
VSMV
VictoryShares US Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility ETF
1.38%1.35%1.36%1.77%1.99%1.36%2.01%2.00%2.42%1.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLVE and VSMV have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLVE has higher volatility (9.47%) compared to VSMV (3.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVE dropped -29.96% vs VSMV's -31.33%.

On 5-year performance, VSMV leads with 10.96% vs 6.83% for QLVE. On fees, VSMV is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, VSMV has been the lower-risk option at 3.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, VSMV has performed better with a 10.96% return vs 6.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

VSMV is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QLVE.

QLVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.64%, compared with 1.38% for VSMV.

QLVE tracks Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index, while VSMV tracks Nasdaq Victory Multi-Factor Minimum Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Crestview. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QLVE and 0.35% for VSMV.

VSMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs 1.44), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLVE and VSMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer