PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLVE vs. SMLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLVE vs. SMLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLVE achieves a 18.06% return, which is significantly higher than SMLV's 12.88% return.


QLVE

1D
-1.29%
1M
7.29%
YTD
18.06%
6M
19.74%
1Y
34.41%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*

SMLV

1D
-1.48%
1M
1.39%
YTD
12.88%
6M
12.84%
1Y
21.90%
3Y*
15.66%
5Y*
7.75%
10Y*
10.05%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLVE vs. SMLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
18.06%21.87%10.17%8.53%-13.10%0.90%4.16%4.98%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
12.88%5.66%16.77%7.52%-7.69%27.67%-1.55%8.42%

Correlation

The correlation between QLVE and SMLV is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.43

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019

0.48

QLVE vs. SMLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QLVE
SMLV

Technology

59.6%
11.2%

Financial Services

38.5%
30.5%

Communication Services

18.4%
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
8.7%

Healthcare

7.6%
8.7%

Energy

7.2%
1.8%

Industrials

7.1%
14.3%

Basic Materials

5.5%
3.2%

Utilities

5.4%
2.9%

Real Estate

0.1%
12.2%

Technology

QLVE
59.6%
SMLV
11.2%

Financial Services

QLVE
38.5%
SMLV
30.5%

Communication Services

QLVE
18.4%
SMLV
2.2%

Consumer Defensive

QLVE
10.8%
SMLV
4.3%

Consumer Cyclical

QLVE
10.4%
SMLV
8.7%

Healthcare

QLVE
7.6%
SMLV
8.7%

Energy

QLVE
7.2%
SMLV
1.8%

Industrials

QLVE
7.1%
SMLV
14.3%

Basic Materials

QLVE
5.5%
SMLV
3.2%

Utilities

QLVE
5.4%
SMLV
2.9%

Real Estate

QLVE
0.1%
SMLV
12.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLVE vs. SMLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLVE
QLVE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QLVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLVE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QLVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SMLV
SMLV Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
SMLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMLV Omega Ratio Rank: 3939
Omega Ratio Rank
SMLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMLV Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLVE vs. SMLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLVESMLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.94

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.26

+0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

3.00

-0.02

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.97

8.20

+3.77

QLVE vs. SMLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLVE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the SMLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLVE and SMLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLVESMLVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.40

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.43

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

0.54

-0.07

Drawdowns

QLVE vs. SMLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLVE drawdown since its inception was -29.96%, smaller than the maximum SMLV drawdown of -42.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVE and SMLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLVESMLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.96%

-42.45%

+12.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.60%

-7.34%

-4.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.29%

-20.40%

+7.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.94%

-20.40%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-1.48%

+0.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-5.46%

-2.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

2.68%

+0.20%

Volatility

QLVE vs. SMLV - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF (SMLV) at 3.98%. This indicates that QLVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLVESMLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

3.98%

+2.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

9.88%

+4.94%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.46%

15.73%

+0.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.48%

18.28%

-4.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.79%

20.95%

-5.16%

QLVE vs. SMLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLVE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is higher than SMLV's 0.12% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLVE vs. SMLV - Dividend Comparison

QLVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than SMLV's 2.35% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.42%3.14%3.11%3.00%2.48%2.57%1.66%1.27%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
SMLV
SPDR SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index ETF
2.35%2.74%2.68%2.68%2.40%2.12%2.47%2.62%3.15%7.92%3.04%2.63%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLVE and SMLV have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLVE has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to SMLV (3.98%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVE dropped -29.96% vs SMLV's -42.45%.

On 5-year performance, SMLV leads with 7.75% vs 7.43% for QLVE. On fees, SMLV is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SMLV has been the lower-risk option at 3.98%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SMLV has performed better with a 7.75% return vs 7.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SMLV is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QLVE.

QLVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 2.35% for SMLV.

QLVE tracks Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index, while SMLV tracks SSGA US Small Cap Low Volatility Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QLVE and 0.12% for SMLV.

QLVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLVE and SMLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer