PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLVE vs. SIXH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLVE vs. SIXH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLVE achieves a 18.06% return, which is significantly higher than SIXH's 7.20% return.


QLVE

1D
-1.29%
1M
7.29%
YTD
18.06%
6M
19.74%
1Y
34.41%
3Y*
18.46%
5Y*
7.43%
10Y*

SIXH

1D
0.48%
1M
-0.21%
YTD
7.20%
6M
8.70%
1Y
10.61%
3Y*
12.22%
5Y*
8.95%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLVE vs. SIXH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
18.06%21.87%10.17%8.53%-13.10%0.90%24.91%
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
7.20%9.47%12.06%4.93%6.90%18.37%5.83%

Correlation

The correlation between QLVE and SIXH is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.29

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020

0.30

Over the past year, the correlation between QLVE and SIXH has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

QLVE vs. SIXH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QLVE
SIXH

Technology

59.6%
20.2%

Financial Services

38.5%
9.7%

Communication Services

18.4%
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

10.8%
23.2%

Consumer Cyclical

10.4%
6.8%

Healthcare

7.6%
12.6%

Energy

7.2%
0.1%

Industrials

7.1%
7.8%

Basic Materials

5.5%
0.1%

Utilities

5.4%
5.0%

Real Estate

0.1%
1.4%

Technology

QLVE
59.6%
SIXH
20.2%

Financial Services

QLVE
38.5%
SIXH
9.7%

Communication Services

QLVE
18.4%
SIXH
13.3%

Consumer Defensive

QLVE
10.8%
SIXH
23.2%

Consumer Cyclical

QLVE
10.4%
SIXH
6.8%

Healthcare

QLVE
7.6%
SIXH
12.6%

Energy

QLVE
7.2%
SIXH
0.1%

Industrials

QLVE
7.1%
SIXH
7.8%

Basic Materials

QLVE
5.5%
SIXH
0.1%

Utilities

QLVE
5.4%
SIXH
5.0%

Real Estate

QLVE
0.1%
SIXH
1.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLVE vs. SIXH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLVE
QLVE Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QLVE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLVE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLVE Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QLVE Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLVE Martin Ratio Rank: 6666
Martin Ratio Rank

SIXH
SIXH Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
SIXH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3939
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SIXH Sortino Ratio Rank: 4343
Sortino Ratio Rank
SIXH Omega Ratio Rank: 3838
Omega Ratio Rank
SIXH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4949
Calmar Ratio Rank
SIXH Martin Ratio Rank: 3939
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLVE vs. SIXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLVESIXHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.70

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.80

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.42

1.25

+0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.98

2.44

+0.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.97

6.25

+5.72

QLVE vs. SIXH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLVE Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is higher than the SIXH Sharpe Ratio of 1.40. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLVE and SIXH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLVESIXHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

1.40

+0.70

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.55

0.87

-0.31

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.48

1.05

-0.58

Drawdowns

QLVE vs. SIXH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLVE drawdown since its inception was -29.96%, which is greater than SIXH's maximum drawdown of -11.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVE and SIXH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLVESIXHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-29.96%

-11.68%

-18.28%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.60%

-4.36%

-7.24%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.29%

-9.10%

-4.19%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.94%

-11.68%

-12.26%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.29%

-2.42%

+1.13%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.29%

-1.85%

-6.44%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.88%

1.70%

+1.18%

Volatility

QLVE vs. SIXH - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) at 2.31%. This indicates that QLVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLVESIXHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

2.31%

+4.51%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

14.82%

6.02%

+8.80%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.46%

7.60%

+8.86%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.48%

10.37%

+3.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

15.79%

10.15%

+5.64%

QLVE vs. SIXH - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLVE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXH's 0.87% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLVE vs. SIXH - Dividend Comparison

QLVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than SIXH's 1.90% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
QLVE
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
2.42%3.14%3.11%3.00%2.48%2.57%1.66%1.27%
SIXH
6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF
1.90%2.23%1.55%2.04%2.06%1.65%1.10%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLVE and SIXH have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QLVE has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to SIXH (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVE dropped -29.96% vs SIXH's -11.68%.

On 5-year performance, SIXH leads with 8.95% vs 7.43% for QLVE. On fees, QLVE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SIXH has performed better with a 8.95% return vs 7.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLVE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.

QLVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 1.90% for SIXH.

They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QLVE and 0.87% for SIXH.

QLVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLVE and SIXH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer