QLVE vs. SIXH
QLVE (FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) and SIXH (6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds. QLVE is passively managed, while SIXH is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QLVE returned 7.43%/yr vs 8.95%/yr for SIXH. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QLVE charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SIXH.
Performance
QLVE vs. SIXH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLVE achieves a 18.06% return, which is significantly higher than SIXH's 7.20% return.
QLVE
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 7.29%
- YTD
- 18.06%
- 6M
- 19.74%
- 1Y
- 34.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- —
SIXH
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 7.20%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- 1Y
- 10.61%
- 3Y*
- 12.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- —
QLVE vs. SIXH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLVE FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 18.06% | 21.87% | 10.17% | 8.53% | -13.10% | 0.90% | 24.91% |
SIXH 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF | 7.20% | 9.47% | 12.06% | 4.93% | 6.90% | 18.37% | 5.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLVE and SIXH is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020 | 0.30 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QLVE and SIXH has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.30, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
QLVE vs. SIXH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QLVE
SIXH
Technology
Financial Services
Communication Services
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
Utilities
Real Estate
Technology
QLVE
SIXH
Financial Services
QLVE
SIXH
Communication Services
QLVE
SIXH
Consumer Defensive
QLVE
SIXH
Consumer Cyclical
QLVE
SIXH
Healthcare
QLVE
SIXH
Energy
QLVE
SIXH
Industrials
QLVE
SIXH
Basic Materials
QLVE
SIXH
Utilities
QLVE
SIXH
Real Estate
QLVE
SIXH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLVE vs. SIXH — Risk / Return Rank
QLVE
SIXH
QLVE vs. SIXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) and 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QLVE | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.70 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.80 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.42 | 1.25 | +0.17 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.98 | 2.44 | +0.54 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.97 | 6.25 | +5.72 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLVE | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.10 | 1.40 | +0.70 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.55 | 0.87 | -0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 1.05 | -0.58 |
Drawdowns
QLVE vs. SIXH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLVE drawdown since its inception was -29.96%, which is greater than SIXH's maximum drawdown of -11.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVE and SIXH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLVE | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -29.96% | -11.68% | -18.28% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.60% | -4.36% | -7.24% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -13.29% | -9.10% | -4.19% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.94% | -11.68% | -12.26% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -1.29% | -2.42% | +1.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.29% | -1.85% | -6.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.88% | 1.70% | +1.18% |
Volatility
QLVE vs. SIXH - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) has a higher volatility of 6.82% compared to 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) at 2.31%. This indicates that QLVE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLVE | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.82% | 2.31% | +4.51% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.82% | 6.02% | +8.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.46% | 7.60% | +8.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.48% | 10.37% | +3.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.79% | 10.15% | +5.64% |
QLVE vs. SIXH - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLVE has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXH's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLVE vs. SIXH - Dividend Comparison
QLVE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.42%, more than SIXH's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLVE FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.42% | 3.14% | 3.11% | 3.00% | 2.48% | 2.57% | 1.66% | 1.27% |
SIXH 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF | 1.90% | 2.23% | 1.55% | 2.04% | 2.06% | 1.65% | 1.10% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLVE and SIXH have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLVE has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to SIXH (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVE dropped -29.96% vs SIXH's -11.68%.
On 5-year performance, SIXH leads with 8.95% vs 7.43% for QLVE. On fees, QLVE is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SIXH has performed better with a 8.95% return vs 7.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QLVE is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.
QLVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 1.90% for SIXH.
They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for QLVE and 0.87% for SIXH.
QLVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLVE and SIXH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer