QLVD vs. SIXH
QLVD (FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) and SIXH (6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds. QLVD is passively managed, while SIXH is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QLVD returned 5.83%/yr vs 8.95%/yr for SIXH. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QLVD charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.87%/yr for SIXH.
Performance
QLVD vs. SIXH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLVD achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly lower than SIXH's 7.20% return.
QLVD
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 2.66%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 7.04%
- 3Y*
- 11.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.83%
- 10Y*
- —
SIXH
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -0.21%
- YTD
- 7.20%
- 6M
- 8.70%
- 1Y
- 10.61%
- 3Y*
- 12.22%
- 5Y*
- 8.95%
- 10Y*
- —
QLVD vs. SIXH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.66% | 24.21% | 4.67% | 11.57% | -12.09% | 9.04% | 16.48% |
SIXH 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF | 7.20% | 9.47% | 12.06% | 4.93% | 6.90% | 18.37% | 5.83% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLVD and SIXH is 0.45, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.45 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 12, 2020 | 0.50 |
The correlation between QLVD and SIXH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.41 to 0.50 - a consistent structural relationship.
QLVD vs. SIXH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QLVD
SIXH
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
QLVD
SIXH
Industrials
QLVD
SIXH
Consumer Defensive
QLVD
SIXH
Healthcare
QLVD
SIXH
Utilities
QLVD
SIXH
Communication Services
QLVD
SIXH
Consumer Cyclical
QLVD
SIXH
Real Estate
QLVD
SIXH
Technology
QLVD
SIXH
Basic Materials
QLVD
SIXH
Energy
QLVD
SIXH
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLVD vs. SIXH — Risk / Return Rank
QLVD
SIXH
QLVD vs. SIXH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) and 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QLVD | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.73 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.25 | -0.12 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 2.44 | -1.57 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.58 | 6.25 | -3.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLVD | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 1.40 | -0.73 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.87 | -0.37 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 1.05 | -0.57 |
Drawdowns
QLVD vs. SIXH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLVD drawdown since its inception was -28.20%, which is greater than SIXH's maximum drawdown of -11.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVD and SIXH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLVD | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.20% | -11.68% | -16.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.15% | -4.36% | -3.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.24% | -9.10% | -0.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.99% | -11.68% | -12.31% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.19% | -2.42% | -3.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -1.85% | -3.39% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 1.70% | +1.04% |
Volatility
QLVD vs. SIXH - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) has a higher volatility of 3.02% compared to 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF (SIXH) at 2.31%. This indicates that QLVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SIXH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLVD | SIXH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | 2.31% | +0.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.28% | 6.02% | +2.26% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 7.60% | +2.92% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.73% | 10.37% | +1.36% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 10.15% | +3.82% |
QLVD vs. SIXH - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLVD has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is lower than SIXH's 0.87% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLVD vs. SIXH - Dividend Comparison
QLVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than SIXH's 1.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.78% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 3.33% | 2.47% | 3.06% | 1.78% | 1.06% |
SIXH 6 Meridian Hedged Equity-Index Option Strategy ETF | 1.90% | 2.23% | 1.55% | 2.04% | 2.06% | 1.65% | 1.10% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLVD and SIXH have a correlation of 0.45, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLVD has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to SIXH (2.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVD dropped -28.20% vs SIXH's -11.68%.
On 5-year performance, SIXH leads with 8.95% vs 5.83% for QLVD. On fees, QLVD is cheaper at 0.32% per year. On volatility, SIXH has been the lower-risk option at 2.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SIXH has performed better with a 8.95% return vs 5.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QLVD is cheaper with a 0.32% expense ratio, compared with 0.87% for SIXH.
QLVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 1.90% for SIXH.
They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Exchange Traded Concepts. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for QLVD and 0.87% for SIXH.
SIXH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.40 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLVD and SIXH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer