QLVD vs. QLV
QLVD (FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) and QLV (FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds from Northern Trust - QLVD tracks the Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index while QLV tracks the Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QLVD returned 5.83%/yr vs 10.73%/yr for QLV. A 0.70 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QLVD charges 0.32%/yr vs 0.22%/yr for QLV.
Performance
QLVD vs. QLV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLVD achieves a 2.66% return, which is significantly lower than QLV's 5.48% return.
QLVD
- 1D
- -0.68%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 2.66%
- 6M
- 4.87%
- 1Y
- 7.04%
- 3Y*
- 11.60%
- 5Y*
- 5.83%
- 10Y*
- —
QLV
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 5.48%
- 6M
- 5.38%
- 1Y
- 14.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.73%
- 10Y*
- —
QLVD vs. QLV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.66% | 24.21% | 4.67% | 11.57% | -12.09% | 9.04% | 3.00% | 6.35% |
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 5.48% | 12.28% | 18.08% | 13.71% | -9.97% | 26.08% | 9.63% | 6.24% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLVD and QLV is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.70 |
The correlation between QLVD and QLV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.62 to 0.70 - a consistent structural relationship.
QLVD vs. QLV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QLVD
QLV
Financial Services
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Utilities
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Technology
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
QLVD
QLV
Industrials
QLVD
QLV
Consumer Defensive
QLVD
QLV
Healthcare
QLVD
QLV
Utilities
QLVD
QLV
Communication Services
QLVD
QLV
Consumer Cyclical
QLVD
QLV
Real Estate
QLVD
QLV
Technology
QLVD
QLV
Basic Materials
QLVD
QLV
Energy
QLVD
QLV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLVD vs. QLV — Risk / Return Rank
QLVD
QLV
QLVD vs. QLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) and FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QLVD | QLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.17 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.67 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.32 | -0.20 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.87 | 2.28 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.58 | 9.69 | -7.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLVD | QLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 | 1.85 | -1.17 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 0.85 | -0.35 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.48 | 0.69 | -0.21 |
Drawdowns
QLVD vs. QLV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLVD drawdown since its inception was -28.20%, smaller than the maximum QLV drawdown of -33.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLVD and QLV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLVD | QLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.20% | -33.71% | +5.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -8.15% | -6.19% | -1.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -9.24% | -12.05% | +2.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -23.99% | -17.93% | -6.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.19% | -0.81% | -5.38% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.24% | -4.00% | -1.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.74% | 1.45% | +1.29% |
Volatility
QLVD vs. QLV - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVD) has a higher volatility of 3.02% compared to FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) at 1.61%. This indicates that QLVD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLVD | QLV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.02% | 1.61% | +1.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 8.28% | 5.34% | +2.94% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.52% | 7.65% | +2.87% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 11.73% | 12.64% | -0.91% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.97% | 16.57% | -2.60% |
QLVD vs. QLV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLVD has a 0.32% expense ratio, which is higher than QLV's 0.22% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLVD vs. QLV - Dividend Comparison
QLVD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.78%, more than QLV's 1.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.66% | 1.60% | 1.74% | 0.96% | 1.24% | 0.58% |
QLVD FlexShares Developed Markets ex-US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.78% | 2.87% | 3.01% | 3.33% | 2.47% | 3.06% | 1.78% | 1.06% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLVD and QLV have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLVD has higher volatility (3.02%) compared to QLV (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLVD dropped -28.20% vs QLV's -33.71%.
On 5-year performance, QLV leads with 10.73% vs 5.83% for QLVD. On fees, QLV is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, QLV has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QLV has performed better with a 10.73% return vs 5.83%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QLV is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.32% for QLVD.
QLVD has the higher dividend yield at 2.78%, compared with 1.52% for QLV.
QLVD tracks Northern Trust Developed Markets ex US Quality Low Volatility Index, while QLV tracks Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.32% for QLVD and 0.22% for QLV.
QLV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.85 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLVD and QLV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer