PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLV vs. UGA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLV vs. UGA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) and United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLV achieves a 9.55% return, which is significantly lower than UGA's 80.98% return.


QLV

1D
0.50%
1M
1.91%
6M
6.89%
YTD
9.55%
1Y
16.70%
3Y*
15.60%
5Y*
10.05%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.67%

UGA

1D
-5.27%
1M
8.52%
6M
69.92%
YTD
80.98%
1Y
78.20%
3Y*
16.66%
5Y*
25.31%
10Y*
16.82%
ALL TIME*
4.51%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$571.44K$481.55K$516.78K
$8.16M$5.91M$4.98M

QLV vs. UGA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
9.55%12.28%18.08%13.71%-9.97%26.08%9.63%5.97%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund, LP
80.98%-2.00%3.77%1.27%46.34%68.49%-24.88%2.77%

Correlation

The correlation between QLV and UGA is -0.20, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.20

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

-0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.03

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2019

0.12

The correlation between QLV and UGA shifts across timeframes, from -0.20 (1 year) to 0.12 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLV vs. UGA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QLV
QLV Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
QLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLV Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
QLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLV Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank

UGA
UGA Risk / Return Rank: 8383
Overall Rank
UGA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGA Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGA Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
UGA Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGA Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QLV vs. UGA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) and United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QLVUGADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.35

+0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

3.87

-1.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.17

10.83

+0.34

QLV vs. UGA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLV Sharpe Ratio is 2.13, which is comparable to the UGA Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLV and UGA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QLV vs. UGA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLV drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, smaller than the maximum UGA drawdown of -86.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLV and UGA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLVUGADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.71%

-86.59%

+52.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.19%

-20.32%

+14.13%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.05%

-26.68%

+14.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.93%

-38.11%

+20.18%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-75.89%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-10.61%

+10.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.93%

-36.53%

+32.60%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.50%

7.25%

-5.75%

Volatility

QLV vs. UGA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) is 2.30%, while United States Gasoline Fund, LP (UGA) has a volatility of 12.68%. This indicates that QLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UGA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLVUGADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.30%

12.68%

-10.38%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.98%

32.51%

-26.53%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.88%

36.42%

-28.54%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.64%

34.68%

-22.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.43%

37.30%

-20.87%

QLV vs. UGA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLV has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than UGA's 1.02% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLV vs. UGA - Dividend Comparison

QLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, while UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
QLV
FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund
1.52%1.60%1.66%1.60%1.74%0.96%1.24%0.58%
UGA
United States Gasoline Fund, LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLV and UGA have a correlation of -0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGA has higher volatility (12.68%) compared to QLV (2.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLV dropped -33.71% vs UGA's -86.59%.

On 5-year performance, UGA leads with 25.31% vs 10.05% for QLV. On fees, QLV is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, QLV has been the lower-risk option at 2.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, UGA has performed better with a 25.31% return vs 10.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLV is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 1.02% for UGA.

QLV has the higher dividend yield at 1.52%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.

QLV is categorized as Quality Factor, while UGA is Oil & Gas. QLV tracks Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index, while UGA tracks Near-Month NYMEX RBOB Gasoline Futures Contract. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and USCF. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for QLV and 1.02% for UGA.

UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 2.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLV and UGA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer