QLV vs. QLVE
QLV (FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) and QLVE (FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund) are both Volatility Hedged Equity funds from Northern Trust - QLV tracks the Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index while QLVE tracks the Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QLV returned 10.73%/yr vs 7.43%/yr for QLVE. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QLV charges 0.22%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QLVE.
Performance
QLV vs. QLVE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLV achieves a 5.48% return, which is significantly lower than QLVE's 18.06% return.
QLV
- 1D
- -0.51%
- 1M
- 2.14%
- YTD
- 5.48%
- 6M
- 5.38%
- 1Y
- 14.06%
- 3Y*
- 15.15%
- 5Y*
- 10.73%
- 10Y*
- —
QLVE
- 1D
- -1.29%
- 1M
- 7.29%
- YTD
- 18.06%
- 6M
- 19.74%
- 1Y
- 34.41%
- 3Y*
- 18.46%
- 5Y*
- 7.43%
- 10Y*
- —
QLV vs. QLVE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 5.48% | 12.28% | 18.08% | 13.71% | -9.97% | 26.08% | 9.63% | 6.24% |
QLVE FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 18.06% | 21.87% | 10.17% | 8.53% | -13.10% | 0.90% | 4.16% | 4.98% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLV and QLVE is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 17, 2019 | 0.56 |
The correlation between QLV and QLVE shifts across timeframes, from 0.46 (1 year) to 0.56 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
QLV vs. QLVE - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QLV
QLVE
Technology
Healthcare
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Utilities
Industrials
Energy
Basic Materials
Real Estate
Technology
QLV
QLVE
Healthcare
QLV
QLVE
Financial Services
QLV
QLVE
Consumer Defensive
QLV
QLVE
Communication Services
QLV
QLVE
Consumer Cyclical
QLV
QLVE
Utilities
QLV
QLVE
Industrials
QLV
QLVE
Energy
QLV
QLVE
Basic Materials
QLV
QLVE
Real Estate
QLV
QLVE
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLV vs. QLVE — Risk / Return Rank
QLV
QLVE
QLV vs. QLVE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) and FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QLV | QLVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.85 | 2.10 | -0.25 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 2.68 | 2.99 | -0.30 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.32 | 1.42 | -0.09 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.28 | 2.98 | -0.70 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.69 | 11.97 | -2.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLV | QLVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.85 | 2.10 | -0.25 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.85 | 0.55 | +0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.69 | 0.48 | +0.21 |
Drawdowns
QLV vs. QLVE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLV drawdown since its inception was -33.71%, which is greater than QLVE's maximum drawdown of -29.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLV and QLVE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLV | QLVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.71% | -29.96% | -3.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.19% | -11.60% | +5.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.05% | -13.29% | +1.24% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -17.93% | -23.94% | +6.01% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.81% | -1.29% | +0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.00% | -8.29% | +4.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.45% | 2.88% | -1.43% |
Volatility
QLV vs. QLVE - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLV) is 1.61%, while FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund (QLVE) has a volatility of 6.82%. This indicates that QLV experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QLVE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLV | QLVE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 6.82% | -5.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 5.34% | 14.82% | -9.48% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 7.65% | 16.46% | -8.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 12.64% | 13.48% | -0.84% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.57% | 15.79% | +0.78% |
QLV vs. QLVE - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLV has a 0.22% expense ratio, which is lower than QLVE's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLV vs. QLVE - Dividend Comparison
QLV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.52%, less than QLVE's 2.42% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLV FlexShares US Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 1.52% | 1.60% | 1.66% | 1.60% | 1.74% | 0.96% | 1.24% | 0.58% |
QLVE FlexShares Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index Fund | 2.42% | 3.14% | 3.11% | 3.00% | 2.48% | 2.57% | 1.66% | 1.27% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLV and QLVE have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QLVE has higher volatility (6.82%) compared to QLV (1.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLV dropped -33.71% vs QLVE's -29.96%.
On 5-year performance, QLV leads with 10.73% vs 7.43% for QLVE. On fees, QLV is cheaper at 0.22% per year. On volatility, QLV has been the lower-risk option at 1.61%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QLV has performed better with a 10.73% return vs 7.43%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QLV is cheaper with a 0.22% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QLVE.
QLVE has the higher dividend yield at 2.42%, compared with 1.52% for QLV.
QLV tracks Northern Trust Quality Low Volatility Index, while QLVE tracks Northern Trust Emerging Markets Quality Low Volatility Index. Their fees differ too: 0.22% for QLV and 0.40% for QLVE.
QLVE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.10 vs 1.85), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLV and QLVE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer