QLFRX vs. JAKVX
Compare and contrast key facts about AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX).
QLFRX is an actively managed fund by AQR. It was launched on Jun 25, 2025. JAKVX is an actively managed fund by John Hancock. It was launched on Apr 11, 2014.
Performance
QLFRX vs. JAKVX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QLFRX vs. JAKVX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QLFRX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 | -9.81% | 6.80% |
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 | 6.71% | 2.92% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLFRX achieves a -9.81% return, which is significantly lower than JAKVX's 6.71% return.
QLFRX
- 1D
- 1.50%
- 1M
- -2.69%
- YTD
- -9.81%
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
JAKVX
- 1D
- 0.76%
- 1M
- -0.17%
- YTD
- 6.71%
- 6M
- 8.36%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QLFRX vs. JAKVX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLFRX has a 6.20% expense ratio, which is higher than JAKVX's 1.54% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QLFRX vs. JAKVX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX) and John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 (JAKVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLFRX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.60 | 3.80 | -4.40 |
Correlation
The correlation between QLFRX and JAKVX is 0.55, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QLFRX vs. JAKVX - Dividend Comparison
QLFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.25%, less than JAKVX's 7.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QLFRX AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 | 0.25% | 0.22% |
JAKVX John Hancock Disciplined Value Global Long/Short Fund Class R6 | 7.94% | 8.47% |
Drawdowns
QLFRX vs. JAKVX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLFRX drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, which is greater than JAKVX's maximum drawdown of -5.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLFRX and JAKVX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLFRX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -14.53% | -5.16% | -9.37% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -10.92% | -2.66% | -8.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.15% | -0.82% | -4.33% |
Volatility
QLFRX vs. JAKVX - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QLFRX | JAKVX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.11% | 7.25% | +8.86% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 7.25% | +8.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.11% | 7.25% | +8.86% |