PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLFRX vs. BTPIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLFRX vs. BTPIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX) and Salient Tactical Plus Fund (BTPIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLFRX achieves a -3.82% return, which is significantly lower than BTPIX's 2.50% return.


QLFRX

1D
3.21%
1M
2.75%
6M
0.43%
YTD
-3.82%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*

BTPIX

1D
0.00%
1M
-1.42%
6M
-0.36%
YTD
2.50%
1Y
7.13%
3Y*
1.04%
5Y*
1.49%
10Y*
3.56%
ALL TIME*
3.93%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

QLFRX vs. BTPIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
QLFRX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6
-3.82%6.80%
BTPIX
Salient Tactical Plus Fund
2.50%0.65%

Correlation

The correlation between QLFRX and BTPIX is 0.66, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 6, 2025

0.66

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLFRX vs. BTPIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

QLFRX

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BTPIX
BTPIX Risk / Return Rank: 1717
Overall Rank
BTPIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BTPIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
BTPIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
BTPIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
BTPIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

QLFRX vs. BTPIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6 (QLFRX) and Salient Tactical Plus Fund (BTPIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QLFRXBTPIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.93

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.54

QLFRX vs. BTPIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QLFRX vs. BTPIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLFRX drawdown since its inception was -14.53%, which is greater than BTPIX's maximum drawdown of -13.30%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLFRX and BTPIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLFRXBTPIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-14.53%

-13.30%

-1.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.84%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-8.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-11.04%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.01%

-4.15%

-0.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.52%

-3.86%

-1.66%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.50%

Volatility

QLFRX vs. BTPIX - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLFRXBTPIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.75%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.74%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.25%

9.78%

+7.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

17.25%

6.34%

+10.91%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

17.25%

8.56%

+8.69%

QLFRX vs. BTPIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLFRX has a 6.20% expense ratio, which is higher than BTPIX's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLFRX vs. BTPIX - Dividend Comparison

QLFRX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.23%, less than BTPIX's 2.74% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
BTPIX
Salient Tactical Plus Fund
2.74%2.81%3.80%4.93%7.72%0.00%6.10%6.16%3.08%0.00%4.14%
QLFRX
AQR LSE Fusion Fund Class R6
0.23%0.22%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLFRX and BTPIX have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLFRX and BTPIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer