PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLENX vs. VEA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLENX vs. VEA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N (QLENX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLENX achieves a -1.51% return, which is significantly lower than VEA's 14.73% return. Over the past 10 years, QLENX has outperformed VEA with an annualized return of 11.68%, while VEA has yielded a comparatively lower 10.72% annualized return.


QLENX

1D
0.90%
1M
0.25%
YTD
-1.51%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
14.37%
3Y*
25.84%
5Y*
21.74%
10Y*
11.68%

VEA

1D
0.34%
1M
3.58%
YTD
14.73%
6M
16.65%
1Y
31.41%
3Y*
19.03%
5Y*
9.51%
10Y*
10.72%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLENX vs. VEA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QLENX
AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N
-1.51%34.07%30.18%23.67%18.92%30.70%-14.18%1.01%-16.64%15.48%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
14.73%35.16%3.15%17.93%-15.34%11.66%9.71%22.62%-14.75%26.42%

Correlation

The correlation between QLENX and VEA is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.40

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.38

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.46

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 16, 2013

0.49

The correlation between QLENX and VEA shifts across timeframes, from 0.33 (5 years) to 0.49 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLENX vs. VEA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLENX
QLENX Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
QLENX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLENX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLENX Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
QLENX Calmar Ratio Rank: 6161
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLENX Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

VEA
VEA Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VEA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VEA Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
VEA Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
VEA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
VEA Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLENX vs. VEA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N (QLENX) and Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QLENXVEADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.20

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.42

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.36

1.33

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.43

2.58

-0.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.52

9.92

-2.40

QLENX vs. VEA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLENX Sharpe Ratio is 2.00, which is comparable to the VEA Sharpe Ratio of 1.81. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLENX and VEA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QLENX vs. VEA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLENX drawdown since its inception was -38.50%, smaller than the maximum VEA drawdown of -60.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLENX and VEA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLENXVEADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.50%

-60.68%

+22.18%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.09%

-11.63%

+5.54%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-7.09%

-13.45%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-17.19%

-29.71%

+12.52%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.50%

-35.73%

-2.77%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.13%

-1.06%

-1.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.47%

-13.28%

+5.81%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.97%

3.02%

-1.05%

Volatility

QLENX vs. VEA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N (QLENX) is 2.67%, while Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF (VEA) has a volatility of 6.84%. This indicates that QLENX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VEA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLENXVEADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.67%

6.84%

-4.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.80%

14.38%

-8.58%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.39%

16.58%

-9.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

10.09%

16.72%

-6.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

10.59%

17.40%

-6.81%

QLENX vs. VEA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLENX has a 1.57% expense ratio, which is higher than VEA's 0.03% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLENX vs. VEA - Dividend Comparison

QLENX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.66%, less than VEA's 2.62% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLENX
AQR Long-Short Equity Fund Class N
1.66%1.64%7.13%21.21%14.09%0.00%1.59%0.00%6.09%8.91%2.87%4.91%
VEA
Vanguard FTSE Developed Markets ETF
2.62%3.22%3.35%3.15%2.91%3.16%2.04%3.04%3.35%2.77%3.05%2.92%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLENX and VEA have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VEA has higher volatility (6.84%) compared to QLENX (2.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLENX dropped -38.50% vs VEA's -60.68%.

QLENX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 1.81), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLENX and VEA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer