QLDY vs. VOO

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QLDY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF) and VOO (Vanguard S&P 500 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLDY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance, while VOO is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. QLDY is actively managed, while VOO is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.93 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QLDY charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for VOO.

Performance

QLDY vs. VOO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLDY achieves a 12.52% return, which is significantly higher than VOO's 8.19% return.

QLDY

• 1D: -3.02%
• 1M: -1.79%
• YTD: 12.52%
• 6M: 10.50%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

VOO

• 1D: -1.42%
• 1M: -1.34%
• YTD: 8.19%
• 6M: 7.24%
• 1Y: 23.69%
• 3Y*: 20.78%
• 5Y*: 13.13%
• 10Y*: 15.61%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLDY vs. VOO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF	12.52%	1.54%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	8.19%	4.06%

Correlation

The correlation between QLDY and VOO is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 18, 2025	0.93

Return for Risk

QLDY vs. VOO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLDY

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

VOO

VOO Risk / Return Rank: 59
VOO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 59
VOO Sortino Ratio Rank: 56
VOO Omega Ratio Rank: 58
VOO Calmar Ratio Rank: 56
VOO Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLDY vs. VOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY) and Vanguard S&P 500 ETF (VOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QLDY	VOO	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.91	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.60	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.35	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	2.67	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	11.96	—

Drawdowns

QLDY vs. VOO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLDY drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, smaller than the maximum VOO drawdown of -33.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLDY and VOO.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLDY	VOO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-17.44%	-33.99%	+16.55%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-8.90%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-18.69%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.52%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-33.99%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.63%	-3.14%	-2.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.23%	-3.68%	-0.55%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.99%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QLDY	VOO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	4.83%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	9.82%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	21.34%	12.46%	+8.88%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.34%	16.91%	+4.43%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.34%	18.02%	+3.32%

QLDY vs. VOO - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLDY has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than VOO's 0.03% expense ratio.

Dividends

QLDY vs. VOO - Dividend Comparison

QLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 24.21%, more than VOO's 1.05% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF	24.21%	9.34%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VOO Vanguard S&P 500 ETF	1.05%	1.13%	1.24%	1.46%	1.69%	1.25%	1.54%	1.88%	2.06%	1.78%	2.02%	2.10%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLDY and VOO in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.93, QLDY and VOO move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, QLDY or VOO?

On fees, VOO is cheaper at 0.03% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QLDY or VOO?

VOO is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for QLDY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QLDY or VOO?

QLDY has the higher dividend yield at 24.21%, compared with 1.05% for VOO.

What is the main difference between QLDY and VOO?

QLDY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while VOO is S&P 500. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for QLDY and 0.03% for VOO.