QLDY vs. HOOW
QLDY (Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF) and HOOW (Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLDY is a Nasdaq-100 fund actively managed by Defiance, while HOOW is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Roundhill. Both are actively managed. A 0.65 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QLDY charges 1.04%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for HOOW.
Performance
QLDY vs. HOOW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLDY achieves a 19.28% return, which is significantly higher than HOOW's -34.08% return.
QLDY
- 1D
- 0.03%
- 1M
- 11.63%
- YTD
- 19.28%
- 6M
- 16.55%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOOW
- 1D
- -7.51%
- 1M
- 8.18%
- YTD
- -34.08%
- 6M
- -46.41%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLDY vs. HOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF | 19.28% | 1.50% |
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | -34.08% | -11.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLDY and HOOW is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 19, 2025 | 0.65 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLDY vs. HOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLDY | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.60 | -0.04 | +1.65 |
Drawdowns
QLDY vs. HOOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLDY drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, smaller than the maximum HOOW drawdown of -65.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLDY and HOOW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLDY | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.44% | -65.74% | +48.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -55.23% | +55.23% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.25% | -29.13% | +24.88% |
Volatility
QLDY vs. HOOW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLDY | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.57% | 83.86% | -64.29% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.57% | 83.86% | -64.29% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.57% | 83.86% | -64.29% |
QLDY vs. HOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLDY has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLDY vs. HOOW - Dividend Comparison
QLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 21.47%, less than HOOW's 163.90% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | 163.90% | 67.92% |
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF | 21.47% | 9.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QLDY and HOOW have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, HOOW is cheaper at 0.99% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
HOOW is cheaper with a 0.99% expense ratio, compared with 1.04% for QLDY.
HOOW has the higher dividend yield at 163.90%, compared with 21.47% for QLDY.
QLDY is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while HOOW is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 1.04% for QLDY and 0.99% for HOOW.
Find the right allocation for QLDY and HOOW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer