QLDY vs. HOOW
Compare and contrast key facts about Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW).
QLDY and HOOW are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. QLDY is an actively managed fund by Defiance. It was launched on Sep 17, 2025. HOOW is an actively managed fund by Roundhill. It was launched on Jun 18, 2025.
Performance
QLDY vs. HOOW - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QLDY vs. HOOW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF | -9.50% | 1.50% |
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | -44.41% | -11.03% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLDY achieves a -9.50% return, which is significantly higher than HOOW's -44.41% return.
QLDY
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -6.07%
- YTD
- -9.50%
- 6M
- -9.60%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
HOOW
- 1D
- 1.52%
- 1M
- -13.07%
- YTD
- -44.41%
- 6M
- -58.06%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QLDY vs. HOOW - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLDY has a 1.04% expense ratio, which is higher than HOOW's 0.99% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QLDY vs. HOOW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF (QLDY) and Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF (HOOW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLDY | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.75 | -0.28 | -0.47 |
Correlation
The correlation between QLDY and HOOW is 0.68, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Dividends
QLDY vs. HOOW - Dividend Comparison
QLDY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 19.76%, less than HOOW's 163.81% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
QLDY Defiance Nasdaq 100 LightningSpread Income ETF | 19.76% | 9.34% |
HOOW Roundhill HOOD WeeklyPay ETF | 163.81% | 67.92% |
Drawdowns
QLDY vs. HOOW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLDY drawdown since its inception was -17.44%, smaller than the maximum HOOW drawdown of -65.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLDY and HOOW.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLDY | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -17.44% | -65.74% | +48.30% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -13.33% | -62.25% | +48.92% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.81% | -23.06% | +18.25% |
Volatility
QLDY vs. HOOW - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QLDY | HOOW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.69% | 82.31% | -62.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 82.31% | -62.62% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.69% | 82.31% | -62.62% |