PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLD vs. TECL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLD vs. TECL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a 31.05% return, which is significantly lower than TECL's 83.49% return. Over the past 10 years, QLD has underperformed TECL with an annualized return of 35.29%, while TECL has yielded a comparatively higher 51.28% annualized return.


QLD

1D
3.03%
1M
0.58%
YTD
31.05%
6M
26.63%
1Y
69.67%
3Y*
46.32%
5Y*
23.57%
10Y*
35.29%

TECL

1D
6.30%
1M
11.53%
YTD
83.49%
6M
68.65%
1Y
192.14%
3Y*
69.70%
5Y*
37.52%
10Y*
51.28%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLD vs. TECL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
31.05%30.36%42.82%117.72%-60.52%54.67%88.90%81.69%-8.31%70.34%
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
83.49%38.60%36.15%203.14%-74.32%112.80%69.46%185.58%-24.03%124.82%

Correlation

The correlation between QLD and TECL is 0.93, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.93

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 30, 2008

0.96

The correlation between QLD and TECL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.93 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLD vs. TECL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QLD
TECL

Technology

53.8%
20.6%

Communication Services

15.8%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%

-

Consumer Defensive

7.7%

-

Healthcare

4.2%

-

Industrials

2.8%
0.0%

Utilities

1.4%

-

Basic Materials

1.1%

-

Energy

0.6%
0.0%

Financial Services

0.2%

-

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QLD
53.8%
TECL
20.6%

Communication Services

QLD
15.8%
TECL

-

Consumer Cyclical

QLD
12.3%
TECL

-

Consumer Defensive

QLD
7.7%
TECL

-

Healthcare

QLD
4.2%
TECL

-

Industrials

QLD
2.8%
TECL
0.0%

Utilities

QLD
1.4%
TECL

-

Basic Materials

QLD
1.1%
TECL

-

Energy

QLD
0.6%
TECL
0.0%

Financial Services

QLD
0.2%
TECL

-

Real Estate

QLD
0.1%
TECL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLD vs. TECL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLD
QLD Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7272
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 5959
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6262
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

TECL
TECL Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
TECL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECL Sortino Ratio Rank: 6969
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECL Omega Ratio Rank: 7272
Omega Ratio Rank
TECL Calmar Ratio Rank: 8484
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECL Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLD vs. TECL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLDTECLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.31

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.34

1.39

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.79

4.15

-1.36

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.64

11.82

-2.18

QLD vs. TECL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.10, which is comparable to the TECL Sharpe Ratio of 2.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLD and TECL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLDTECLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.10

2.94

-0.84

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.53

0.51

+0.02

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.71

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.58

0.73

-0.15

Drawdowns

QLD vs. TECL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, which is greater than TECL's maximum drawdown of -77.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and TECL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLDTECLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.13%

-77.96%

-5.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.13%

-46.58%

+21.45%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.29%

-66.58%

+24.29%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.68%

-77.96%

+14.28%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.68%

-77.96%

+14.28%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.24%

-21.19%

+12.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.16%

-18.38%

+0.22%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.25%

16.33%

-9.08%

Volatility

QLD vs. TECL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) is 13.78%, while Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) has a volatility of 32.17%. This indicates that QLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TECL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLDTECLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.78%

32.17%

-18.39%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.34%

55.30%

-28.96%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.42%

65.89%

-32.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.95%

74.68%

-29.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.68%

72.68%

-28.00%

QLD vs. TECL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TECL's 0.91% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLD vs. TECL - Dividend Comparison

QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than TECL's 3.87% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.13%0.17%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.21%0.11%
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
3.87%7.19%0.29%0.28%0.22%0.32%0.52%0.25%0.47%0.10%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.93, QLD and TECL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

TECL has higher volatility (32.17%) compared to QLD (13.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLD dropped -83.13% vs TECL's -77.96%.

On 10-year performance, TECL leads with 51.28% vs 35.29% for QLD. On fees, TECL is cheaper at 0.91% per year. On volatility, QLD has been the lower-risk option at 13.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, TECL has performed better with a 51.28% return vs 35.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

TECL is cheaper with a 0.91% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.

TECL has the higher dividend yield at 3.87%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.

QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while TECL tracks Technology Select Sector Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QLD and 0.91% for TECL.

TECL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.94 vs 2.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLD and TECL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer