QLD vs. SBIT

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) and SBIT (Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while SBIT is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QLD returned 52.34% vs 124.12% for SBIT. At a correlation of -0.43, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.

Performance

QLD vs. SBIT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a 28.12% return, which is significantly lower than SBIT's 44.00% return.

QLD

• 1D: -3.81%
• 1M: -3.42%
• 6M: 23.12%
• YTD: 28.12%
• 1Y: 52.34%
• 3Y*: 39.12%
• 5Y*: 19.39%
• 10Y*: 34.28%

SBIT

• 1D: 5.38%
• 1M: 1.44%
• 6M: 58.27%
• YTD: 44.00%
• 1Y: 124.12%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLD vs. SBIT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	28.12%	30.36%	23.42%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	44.00%	-25.11%	-73.74%

Correlation

The correlation between QLD and SBIT is -0.48, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.48
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2024	-0.43

Return for Risk

QLD vs. SBIT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 50
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 47
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 48
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 52
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 51

SBIT

SBIT Risk / Return Rank: 52
SBIT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 51
SBIT Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
SBIT Omega Ratio Rank: 48
SBIT Calmar Ratio Rank: 66
SBIT Martin Ratio Rank: 45

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLD vs. SBIT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QLD	SBIT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.42	1.41	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.90	2.05	-0.15
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.25	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.09	2.60	-0.51
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.85	5.92	+0.93

QLD vs. SBIT - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLD Sharpe Ratio is 1.42, which is comparable to the SBIT Sharpe Ratio of 1.41. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLD and SBIT, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QLD vs. SBIT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, smaller than the maximum SBIT drawdown of -91.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and SBIT.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLD	SBIT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.13%	-91.35%	+8.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.13%	-47.94%	+22.81%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-10.29%	-77.15%	+66.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.11%	-68.83%	+50.72%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.66%	21.04%	-13.38%

Volatility

QLD vs. SBIT - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) is 17.17%, while Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF (SBIT) has a volatility of 22.98%. This indicates that QLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SBIT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QLD	SBIT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.17%	22.98%	-5.81%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.63%	68.89%	-38.26%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	37.07%	88.51%	-51.44%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.56%	96.89%	-51.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.86%	96.89%	-52.03%

QLD vs. SBIT - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QLD and SBIT have an expense ratio of 0.95%.

Dividends

QLD vs. SBIT - Dividend Comparison

QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.13%, less than SBIT's 3.97% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.13%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%
SBIT Proshares Ultrashort Bitcoin ETF	3.97%	0.52%	1.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLD and SBIT in my portfolio?

QLD and SBIT have a correlation of -0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QLD or SBIT?

SBIT has higher volatility (22.98%) compared to QLD (17.17%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLD dropped -83.13% vs SBIT's -91.35%.

Which ETF is better, QLD or SBIT?

On 1-year performance, SBIT leads with 124.12% vs 52.34% for QLD. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, QLD has been the lower-risk option at 17.17%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QLD or SBIT?

Over the 1-year period, SBIT has performed better with a 124.12% return vs 52.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QLD or SBIT?

QLD and SBIT have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QLD or SBIT?

SBIT has the higher dividend yield at 3.97%, compared with 0.13% for QLD.

What is the main difference between QLD and SBIT?

QLD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while SBIT is Cryptocurrency. QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while SBIT tracks Bloomberg Bitcoin Index (-200%).

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.42 vs 1.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.