PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLD vs. KORU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLD vs. KORU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a 42.06% return, which is significantly lower than KORU's 559.14% return. Over the past 10 years, QLD has outperformed KORU with an annualized return of 36.10%, while KORU has yielded a comparatively lower 19.62% annualized return.


QLD

1D
-0.53%
1M
21.54%
YTD
42.06%
6M
37.45%
1Y
85.49%
3Y*
50.15%
5Y*
25.75%
10Y*
36.10%

KORU

1D
-2.29%
1M
92.47%
YTD
559.14%
6M
689.29%
1Y
2,160.10%
3Y*
132.56%
5Y*
23.42%
10Y*
19.62%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLD vs. KORU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
42.06%30.36%42.82%117.72%-60.52%54.67%88.90%81.69%-8.31%70.34%
KORU
Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares
559.14%432.73%-62.18%28.61%-70.16%-33.86%48.78%5.47%-59.89%167.08%

Correlation

The correlation between QLD and KORU is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.65

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.60

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.60

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.59

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 11, 2013

0.56

The correlation between QLD and KORU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.56 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLD vs. KORU - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QLD
KORU

Technology

53.8%
52.3%

Communication Services

15.8%
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
1.8%

Healthcare

4.2%
3.5%

Industrials

2.8%
20.4%

Utilities

1.4%
0.4%

Basic Materials

1.1%
2.0%

Energy

0.6%
1.4%

Financial Services

0.2%
16.7%

Real Estate

0.1%

-

Technology

QLD
53.8%
KORU
52.3%

Communication Services

QLD
15.8%
KORU
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

QLD
12.3%
KORU
5.8%

Consumer Defensive

QLD
7.7%
KORU
1.8%

Healthcare

QLD
4.2%
KORU
3.5%

Industrials

QLD
2.8%
KORU
20.4%

Utilities

QLD
1.4%
KORU
0.4%

Basic Materials

QLD
1.1%
KORU
2.0%

Energy

QLD
0.6%
KORU
1.4%

Financial Services

QLD
0.2%
KORU
16.7%

Real Estate

QLD
0.1%
KORU

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLD vs. KORU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLD
QLD Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

KORU
KORU Risk / Return Rank: 9797
Overall Rank
KORU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100100
Sharpe Ratio Rank
KORU Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
KORU Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
KORU Calmar Ratio Rank: 9999
Calmar Ratio Rank
KORU Martin Ratio Rank: 9999
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLD vs. KORU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLDKORUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-14.93

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.04

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.72

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

35.65

-32.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.92

112.99

-101.08

QLD vs. KORU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is lower than the KORU Sharpe Ratio of 17.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLD and KORU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLDKORUDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

17.63

-14.93

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

0.28

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

0.25

+0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

0.13

+0.47

Drawdowns

QLD vs. KORU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, smaller than the maximum KORU drawdown of -95.79%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and KORU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLDKORUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.13%

-95.79%

+12.66%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.13%

-61.39%

+36.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.29%

-73.71%

+31.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.68%

-93.35%

+29.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.68%

-95.79%

+32.11%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-5.39%

+4.86%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.17%

-57.53%

+39.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.20%

19.33%

-12.13%

Volatility

QLD vs. KORU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) is 8.90%, while Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares (KORU) has a volatility of 60.18%. This indicates that QLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than KORU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLDKORUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.90%

60.18%

-51.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.08%

110.71%

-86.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.85%

124.15%

-92.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.74%

85.11%

-40.37%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.56%

79.91%

-35.35%

QLD vs. KORU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than KORU's 1.29% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLD vs. KORU - Dividend Comparison

QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than KORU's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
KORU
Direxion Daily South Korea Bull 3X Shares
0.14%0.89%4.10%2.55%0.48%0.76%0.01%0.93%1.40%3.59%0.00%0.00%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.12%0.17%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.21%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


QLD and KORU have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

KORU has higher volatility (60.18%) compared to QLD (8.90%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLD dropped -83.13% vs KORU's -95.79%.

On 10-year performance, QLD leads with 36.10% vs 19.62% for KORU. On fees, QLD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QLD has been the lower-risk option at 8.90%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, QLD has performed better with a 36.10% return vs 19.62%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QLD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for KORU.

KORU has the higher dividend yield at 0.14%, compared with 0.12% for QLD.

QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while KORU tracks MSCI Korea 25-50 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QLD and 1.29% for KORU.

KORU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (17.63 vs 2.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLD and KORU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer