PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLD vs. JEPQ
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLD vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a 42.06% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 9.54% return.


QLD

1D
-0.53%
1M
21.54%
YTD
42.06%
6M
37.45%
1Y
85.49%
3Y*
50.15%
5Y*
25.75%
10Y*
36.10%

JEPQ

1D
-0.10%
1M
4.31%
YTD
9.54%
6M
9.75%
1Y
29.00%
3Y*
20.92%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLD vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
42.06%30.36%42.82%117.72%-40.29%
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
9.54%15.18%24.85%36.28%-12.89%

Correlation

The correlation between QLD and JEPQ is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022

0.97

The correlation between QLD and JEPQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLD vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QLD
JEPQ

Technology

53.8%
54.0%

Communication Services

15.8%
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

12.3%
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

7.7%
7.1%

Healthcare

4.2%
4.4%

Industrials

2.8%
3.1%

Utilities

1.4%
1.3%

Basic Materials

1.1%
1.0%

Energy

0.6%
0.4%

Financial Services

0.2%
0.4%

Real Estate

0.1%
0.2%

Technology

QLD
53.8%
JEPQ
54.0%

Communication Services

QLD
15.8%
JEPQ
15.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QLD
12.3%
JEPQ
12.8%

Consumer Defensive

QLD
7.7%
JEPQ
7.1%

Healthcare

QLD
4.2%
JEPQ
4.4%

Industrials

QLD
2.8%
JEPQ
3.1%

Utilities

QLD
1.4%
JEPQ
1.3%

Basic Materials

QLD
1.1%
JEPQ
1.0%

Energy

QLD
0.6%
JEPQ
0.4%

Financial Services

QLD
0.2%
JEPQ
0.4%

Real Estate

QLD
0.1%
JEPQ
0.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLD vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLD
QLD Risk / Return Rank: 6969
Overall Rank
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 6464
Martin Ratio Rank

JEPQ
JEPQ Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
JEPQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
JEPQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
JEPQ Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
JEPQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
JEPQ Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLD vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QLDJEPQDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.22

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.13

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.41

1.49

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.42

3.31

+0.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.92

16.22

-4.31

QLD vs. JEPQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the JEPQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.49. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLD and JEPQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QLDJEPQDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.70

2.49

+0.22

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.58

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.81

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.60

1.00

-0.41

Drawdowns

QLD vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and JEPQ.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLDJEPQDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.13%

-20.07%

-63.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-25.13%

-8.82%

-16.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-42.29%

-20.07%

-22.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.68%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-63.68%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.53%

-0.10%

-0.43%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.17%

-3.42%

-14.75%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.20%

1.79%

+5.41%

Volatility

QLD vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a higher volatility of 8.90% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 1.26%. This indicates that QLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLDJEPQDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.90%

1.26%

+7.64%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

24.08%

9.07%

+15.01%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

31.85%

11.73%

+20.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

44.74%

16.61%

+28.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

44.56%

16.61%

+27.95%

QLD vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

QLD vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison

QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than JEPQ's 10.07% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
JEPQ
JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF
10.07%10.53%9.65%10.03%9.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QLD
ProShares Ultra QQQ
0.12%0.17%0.25%0.33%0.31%0.00%0.00%0.13%0.06%0.02%0.21%0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.95, QLD and JEPQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QLD has higher volatility (8.90%) compared to JEPQ (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLD dropped -83.13% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.

On 3-year performance, QLD leads with 50.15% vs 20.92% for JEPQ. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 3-year period, QLD has performed better with a 50.15% return vs 20.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.

JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.07%, compared with 0.12% for QLD.

QLD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QLD and 0.35% for JEPQ.

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLD and JEPQ

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer