QLD vs. JEPQ
QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) and JEPQ (JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while JEPQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QLD returned 50.15%/yr vs 20.92%/yr for JEPQ. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QLD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for JEPQ.
Performance
QLD vs. JEPQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a 42.06% return, which is significantly higher than JEPQ's 9.54% return.
QLD
- 1D
- -0.53%
- 1M
- 21.54%
- YTD
- 42.06%
- 6M
- 37.45%
- 1Y
- 85.49%
- 3Y*
- 50.15%
- 5Y*
- 25.75%
- 10Y*
- 36.10%
JEPQ
- 1D
- -0.10%
- 1M
- 4.31%
- YTD
- 9.54%
- 6M
- 9.75%
- 1Y
- 29.00%
- 3Y*
- 20.92%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QLD vs. JEPQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 42.06% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -40.29% |
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 9.54% | 15.18% | 24.85% | 36.28% | -12.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between QLD and JEPQ is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.95 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.97 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 5, 2022 | 0.97 |
The correlation between QLD and JEPQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.
QLD vs. JEPQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QLD
JEPQ
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Consumer Defensive
Healthcare
Industrials
Utilities
Basic Materials
Energy
Financial Services
Real Estate
Technology
QLD
JEPQ
Communication Services
QLD
JEPQ
Consumer Cyclical
QLD
JEPQ
Consumer Defensive
QLD
JEPQ
Healthcare
QLD
JEPQ
Industrials
QLD
JEPQ
Utilities
QLD
JEPQ
Basic Materials
QLD
JEPQ
Energy
QLD
JEPQ
Financial Services
QLD
JEPQ
Real Estate
QLD
JEPQ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QLD vs. JEPQ — Risk / Return Rank
QLD
JEPQ
QLD vs. JEPQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QLD | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.13 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.41 | 1.49 | -0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.42 | 3.31 | +0.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.92 | 16.22 | -4.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLD | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.70 | 2.49 | +0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.81 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 1.00 | -0.41 |
Drawdowns
QLD vs. JEPQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, which is greater than JEPQ's maximum drawdown of -20.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and JEPQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLD | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.13% | -20.07% | -63.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.13% | -8.82% | -16.31% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -42.29% | -20.07% | -22.22% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.68% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.68% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.53% | -0.10% | -0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.17% | -3.42% | -14.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.20% | 1.79% | +5.41% |
Volatility
QLD vs. JEPQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a higher volatility of 8.90% compared to JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF (JEPQ) at 1.26%. This indicates that QLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than JEPQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QLD | JEPQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.90% | 1.26% | +7.64% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 24.08% | 9.07% | +15.01% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 31.85% | 11.73% | +20.12% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.74% | 16.61% | +28.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.56% | 16.61% | +27.95% |
QLD vs. JEPQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than JEPQ's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QLD vs. JEPQ - Dividend Comparison
QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than JEPQ's 10.07% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
JEPQ JPMorgan Nasdaq Equity Premium Income ETF | 10.07% | 10.53% | 9.65% | 10.03% | 9.44% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.12% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, QLD and JEPQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
QLD has higher volatility (8.90%) compared to JEPQ (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLD dropped -83.13% vs JEPQ's -20.07%.
On 3-year performance, QLD leads with 50.15% vs 20.92% for JEPQ. On fees, JEPQ is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, JEPQ has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, QLD has performed better with a 50.15% return vs 20.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
JEPQ is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.
JEPQ has the higher dividend yield at 10.07%, compared with 0.12% for QLD.
QLD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while JEPQ is Nasdaq-100. QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while JEPQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Index. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QLD and 0.35% for JEPQ.
QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.49), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QLD and JEPQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer