QLD vs. IQQQ

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) and IQQQ (ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLD is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while IQQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Daily Covered Call Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QLD returned 85.49% vs 38.70% for IQQQ. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QLD charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for IQQQ.

Performance

QLD vs. IQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a 42.06% return, which is significantly higher than IQQQ's 18.72% return.

QLD

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 21.54%
• YTD: 42.06%
• 6M: 37.45%
• 1Y: 85.49%
• 3Y*: 50.15%
• 5Y*: 25.75%
• 10Y*: 36.10%

IQQQ

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: 9.88%
• YTD: 18.72%
• 6M: 17.39%
• 1Y: 38.70%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLD vs. IQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	42.06%	30.36%	23.82%
IQQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	18.72%	17.11%	13.39%

Correlation

The correlation between QLD and IQQQ is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2024	0.99

The correlation between QLD and IQQQ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.99 to 0.99 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLD vs. IQQQ - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QLD	IQQQ
Technology	53.8%	53.8%
Communication Services	15.8%	15.8%
Consumer Cyclical	12.3%	12.3%
Consumer Defensive	7.7%	7.7%
Healthcare	4.2%	4.2%
Industrials	2.8%	2.8%
Utilities	1.4%	1.4%
Basic Materials	1.1%	1.1%
Energy	0.6%	0.6%
Financial Services	0.2%	0.2%
Real Estate	0.1%	0.1%

Return for Risk

QLD vs. IQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 69
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 64

IQQQ

IQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 70
IQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
IQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 70
IQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 69
IQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 69
IQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 66

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLD vs. IQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QLD	IQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	2.53	+0.17
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	3.27	-0.11
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.43	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.42	3.49	-0.07
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.92	12.41	-0.49
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QLD vs. IQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the IQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLD and IQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QLD	IQQQ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.70	2.53	+0.17
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	1.25	-0.65

Drawdowns

QLD vs. IQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, which is greater than IQQQ's maximum drawdown of -20.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and IQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLD	IQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.13%	-20.41%	-62.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.13%	-11.13%	-14.00%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.29%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.68%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.68%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	-0.30%	-0.23%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.17%	-3.64%	-14.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.20%	3.13%	+4.07%

Volatility

QLD vs. IQQQ - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a higher volatility of 8.90% compared to ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) at 3.99%. This indicates that QLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QLD	IQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.90%	3.99%	+4.91%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.08%	11.54%	+12.54%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.85%	15.40%	+16.45%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.74%	18.57%	+26.17%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.56%	18.57%	+25.99%

QLD vs. IQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IQQQ's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

QLD vs. IQQQ - Dividend Comparison

QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than IQQQ's 4.42% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IQQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	4.42%	10.34%	7.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.12%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLD and IQQQ in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.99, QLD and IQQQ move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QLD or IQQQ?

QLD has higher volatility (8.90%) compared to IQQQ (3.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLD dropped -83.13% vs IQQQ's -20.41%.

Which ETF is better, QLD or IQQQ?

On 1-year performance, QLD leads with 85.49% vs 38.70% for IQQQ. On fees, IQQQ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, IQQQ has been the lower-risk option at 3.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QLD or IQQQ?

Over the 1-year period, QLD has performed better with a 85.49% return vs 38.70%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QLD or IQQQ?

IQQQ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QLD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QLD or IQQQ?

IQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 4.42%, compared with 0.12% for QLD.

What is the main difference between QLD and IQQQ?

QLD is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while IQQQ is Nasdaq-100. QLD tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (200%), while IQQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Daily Covered Call Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QLD and 0.55% for IQQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.53), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.