QLD vs. DXQLX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX).
QLD is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100 Index (200%). It was launched on Jun 21, 2006. DXQLX is a passively managed fund by Direxion that tracks the performance of the . It was launched on May 1, 2006.
Performance
QLD vs. DXQLX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QLD vs. DXQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | -11.23% | 30.36% | 42.82% | 117.72% | -60.52% | 54.67% | 88.90% | 81.69% | -8.31% | 70.34% |
DXQLX Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund | -11.33% | 29.99% | 39.26% | 97.59% | -57.72% | 55.98% | 100.94% | 79.36% | -81.54% | 743.06% |
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QLD having a -11.23% return and DXQLX slightly lower at -11.33%. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QLD having a 29.71% annualized return and DXQLX not far behind at 29.62%.
QLD
- 1D
- 2.44%
- 1M
- -8.26%
- YTD
- -11.23%
- 6M
- -9.73%
- 1Y
- 38.72%
- 3Y*
- 36.50%
- 5Y*
- 15.83%
- 10Y*
- 29.71%
DXQLX
- 1D
- 6.38%
- 1M
- -9.02%
- YTD
- -11.33%
- 6M
- -9.50%
- 1Y
- 34.39%
- 3Y*
- 32.72%
- 5Y*
- 14.44%
- 10Y*
- 29.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QLD vs. DXQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than DXQLX's 1.39% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QLD vs. DXQLX — Risk / Return Rank
QLD
DXQLX
QLD vs. DXQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QLD | DXQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.87 | 0.90 | -0.03 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.46 | 1.56 | -0.10 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.21 | -0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.63 | 1.64 | -0.02 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.27 | 5.76 | -0.48 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QLD | DXQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.87 | 0.90 | -0.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 0.34 | +0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 | 0.09 | +0.58 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.53 | 0.01 | +0.52 |
Correlation
The correlation between QLD and DXQLX is 0.97, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QLD vs. DXQLX - Dividend Comparison
QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than DXQLX's 16.69% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ | 0.19% | 0.17% | 0.25% | 0.33% | 0.31% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.13% | 0.06% | 0.02% | 0.21% | 0.11% |
DXQLX Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund | 16.69% | 14.50% | 0.33% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 11.75% | 10.90% | 3.37% | 7.37% | 5.72% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
QLD vs. DXQLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, smaller than the maximum DXQLX drawdown of -97.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and DXQLX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QLD | DXQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.13% | -97.24% | +14.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -25.13% | -22.05% | -3.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -63.68% | -60.79% | -2.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.68% | -87.23% | +23.55% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -18.15% | -16.89% | -1.26% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -18.30% | -66.35% | +48.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.75% | 6.29% | +1.46% |
Volatility
QLD vs. DXQLX - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a higher volatility of 13.16% compared to Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX) at 11.85%. This indicates that QLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXQLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QLD | DXQLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.16% | 11.85% | +1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.67% | 22.83% | +2.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 44.97% | 40.60% | +4.37% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 44.76% | 42.31% | +2.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.47% | 316.45% | -271.98% |