QLD vs. DXQLX

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

QLD (ProShares Ultra QQQ) and DXQLX (Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund) are both Leveraged Equities funds. Over the past 10 years, QLD returned 36.10%/yr vs 35.37%/yr for DXQLX. With a 0.98 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QLD charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.39%/yr for DXQLX.

Performance

QLD vs. DXQLX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLD achieves a 42.06% return, which is significantly higher than DXQLX's 35.36% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with QLD having a 36.10% annualized return and DXQLX not far behind at 35.37%.

QLD

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 21.54%
• YTD: 42.06%
• 6M: 37.45%
• 1Y: 85.49%
• 3Y*: 50.15%
• 5Y*: 25.75%
• 10Y*: 36.10%

DXQLX

• 1D: 0.81%
• 1M: 18.74%
• YTD: 35.36%
• 6M: 31.80%
• 1Y: 71.91%
• 3Y*: 44.83%
• 5Y*: 23.91%
• 10Y*: 35.37%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLD vs. DXQLX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	42.06%	30.36%	42.82%	117.72%	-60.52%	54.67%	88.90%	81.69%	-8.31%	70.34%
DXQLX Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund	35.36%	29.99%	39.26%	97.59%	-57.72%	55.98%	100.94%	79.36%	-81.54%	743.06%

Correlation

The correlation between QLD and DXQLX is 1.00 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.00
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.99
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.99
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.99
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006	0.98

The correlation between QLD and DXQLX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.98 to 1.00 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QLD vs. DXQLX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLD

QLD Risk / Return Rank: 69
QLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
QLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Omega Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 67
QLD Martin Ratio Rank: 64

DXQLX

DXQLX Risk / Return Rank: 67
DXQLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
DXQLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
DXQLX Omega Ratio Rank: 56
DXQLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 75
DXQLX Martin Ratio Rank: 64

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLD vs. DXQLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) and Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QLD	DXQLX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.70	2.66	+0.04
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	3.19	-0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.42	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.42	3.41	+0.01
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	11.92	12.47	-0.56
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QLD vs. DXQLX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLD Sharpe Ratio is 2.70, which is comparable to the DXQLX Sharpe Ratio of 2.66. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLD and DXQLX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QLD	DXQLX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.70	2.66	+0.04
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.58	0.57	+0.01
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.81	0.26	+0.56
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.11	+0.48

Drawdowns

QLD vs. DXQLX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLD drawdown since its inception was -83.13%, smaller than the maximum DXQLX drawdown of -96.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLD and DXQLX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLD	DXQLX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-83.13%	-96.04%	+12.91%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.13%	-21.88%	-3.25%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-42.29%	-37.99%	-4.30%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-63.68%	-60.79%	-2.89%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-63.68%	-87.23%	+23.55%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.53%	0.00%	-0.53%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-18.17%	-51.61%	+33.44%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.20%	5.97%	+1.23%

Volatility

QLD vs. DXQLX - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra QQQ (QLD) has a higher volatility of 8.90% compared to Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund (DXQLX) at 7.58%. This indicates that QLD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DXQLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QLD	DXQLX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.90%	7.58%	+1.32%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.08%	21.24%	+2.84%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	31.85%	28.08%	+3.77%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	44.74%	42.14%	+2.60%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.56%	138.65%	-94.09%

QLD vs. DXQLX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLD has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than DXQLX's 1.39% expense ratio.

Dividends

QLD vs. DXQLX - Dividend Comparison

QLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.12%, less than DXQLX's 10.93% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
DXQLX Direxion Monthly NASDAQ-100 Bull 1.75X Fund	10.93%	14.50%	0.33%	0.00%	0.00%	11.75%	10.90%	3.37%	7.37%	5.72%	0.00%	0.00%
QLD ProShares Ultra QQQ	0.12%	0.17%	0.25%	0.33%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.13%	0.06%	0.02%	0.21%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLD and DXQLX in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 1.00, QLD and DXQLX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QLD or DXQLX?

QLD has higher volatility (8.90%) compared to DXQLX (7.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLD dropped -83.13% vs DXQLX's -96.04%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.70 vs 2.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.