PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QLC vs. XLG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QLC vs. XLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLC achieves a 11.97% return, which is significantly higher than XLG's 5.56% return. Over the past 10 years, QLC has underperformed XLG with an annualized return of 15.08%, while XLG has yielded a comparatively higher 17.23% annualized return.


QLC

1D
1.63%
1M
3.02%
YTD
11.97%
6M
12.35%
1Y
33.81%
3Y*
24.25%
5Y*
15.50%
10Y*
15.08%

XLG

1D
1.88%
1M
-1.70%
YTD
5.56%
6M
6.64%
1Y
25.51%
3Y*
22.53%
5Y*
15.57%
10Y*
17.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLC vs. XLG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QLC
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund
11.97%23.26%26.71%26.02%-17.21%28.46%13.64%24.51%-8.12%21.73%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
5.56%19.51%33.49%38.16%-24.29%30.77%24.15%32.04%-3.59%23.04%

Correlation

The correlation between QLC and XLG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2015

0.84

The correlation between QLC and XLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.84 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLC vs. XLG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QLC
XLG

Technology

37.8%
45.9%

Financial Services

13.2%
9.5%

Communication Services

13.0%
15.9%

Healthcare

9.6%
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

7.8%
10.6%

Industrials

6.3%
2.0%

Utilities

3.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

3.0%
5.5%

Real Estate

2.1%

-

Basic Materials

2.0%
0.6%

Energy

2.0%
2.6%

Technology

QLC
37.8%
XLG
45.9%

Financial Services

QLC
13.2%
XLG
9.5%

Communication Services

QLC
13.0%
XLG
15.9%

Healthcare

QLC
9.6%
XLG
7.4%

Consumer Cyclical

QLC
7.8%
XLG
10.6%

Industrials

QLC
6.3%
XLG
2.0%

Utilities

QLC
3.1%
XLG

-

Consumer Defensive

QLC
3.0%
XLG
5.5%

Real Estate

QLC
2.1%
XLG

-

Basic Materials

QLC
2.0%
XLG
0.6%

Energy

QLC
2.0%
XLG
2.6%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QLC vs. XLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLC
QLC Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
QLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
QLC Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
QLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
QLC Martin Ratio Rank: 8888
Martin Ratio Rank

XLG
XLG Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4646
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 4949
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLC vs. XLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QLCXLGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.77

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.06

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.47

1.33

+0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.84

2.06

+1.78

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

17.56

7.55

+10.01

QLC vs. XLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.64, which is higher than the XLG Sharpe Ratio of 1.86. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLC and XLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QLC vs. XLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLC drawdown since its inception was -35.86%, smaller than the maximum XLG drawdown of -52.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLC and XLG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QLCXLGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.86%

-52.39%

+16.53%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-8.84%

-12.41%

+3.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.49%

-20.70%

+2.21%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-23.81%

-28.02%

+4.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.86%

-30.46%

-5.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.22%

-3.28%

+3.06%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-4.53%

-7.64%

+3.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.93%

3.39%

-1.46%

Volatility

QLC vs. XLG - Volatility Comparison

FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) have volatilities of 4.70% and 4.58%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QLCXLGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

4.58%

+0.12%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.29%

10.57%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.90%

13.78%

-0.88%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.92%

18.76%

-1.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.46%

18.88%

-0.42%

QLC vs. XLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than XLG's 0.20% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

QLC vs. XLG - Dividend Comparison

QLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.87%, more than XLG's 0.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QLC
FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund
0.87%0.94%1.03%1.26%1.46%0.96%1.40%1.91%1.82%1.29%1.80%0.64%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
0.61%0.64%0.72%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.90, QLC and XLG move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QLC has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to XLG (4.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLC dropped -35.86% vs XLG's -52.39%.

On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 17.23% vs 15.08% for QLC. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 4.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 17.23% return vs 15.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QLC.

QLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.87%, compared with 0.61% for XLG.

QLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while XLG is S&P 500. QLC tracks Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index, while XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QLC and 0.20% for XLG.

QLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.64 vs 1.86), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QLC and XLG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer