QLC vs. BLGR

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

QLC (FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund) and BLGR (Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QLC is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Northern Trust Quality Large Cap Index, while BLGR is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund managed by Bluemonte. Over the past year, QLC returned 29.38% vs 22.68% for BLGR. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QLC charges 0.25%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for BLGR.

Performance

QLC vs. BLGR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QLC achieves a 9.59% return, which is significantly higher than BLGR's 5.66% return.

QLC

• 1D: -1.12%
• 1M: -0.37%
• YTD: 9.59%
• 6M: 8.51%
• 1Y: 29.38%
• 3Y*: 23.96%
• 5Y*: 14.86%
• 10Y*: 14.85%

BLGR

• 1D: -1.87%
• 1M: -2.65%
• YTD: 5.66%
• 6M: 4.47%
• 1Y: 22.68%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QLC vs. BLGR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund	9.59%	19.19%
BLGR Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF	5.66%	16.59%

Correlation

The correlation between QLC and BLGR is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.92
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 23, 2025	0.92

The correlation between QLC and BLGR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.92 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.

QLC vs. BLGR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QLC	BLGR
Technology	37.8%	49.0%
Financial Services	13.2%	7.7%
Communication Services	13.0%	15.6%
Healthcare	9.6%	6.9%
Consumer Cyclical	7.8%	10.6%
Industrials	6.3%	6.0%
Utilities	3.1%	0.5%
Consumer Defensive	3.0%	1.7%
Real Estate	2.1%	0.6%
Basic Materials	2.0%	0.7%
Energy	2.0%	0.5%

Return for Risk

QLC vs. BLGR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QLC

QLC Risk / Return Rank: 75
QLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 76
QLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
QLC Omega Ratio Rank: 73
QLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 70
QLC Martin Ratio Rank: 81

BLGR

BLGR Risk / Return Rank: 41
BLGR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
BLGR Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
BLGR Omega Ratio Rank: 41
BLGR Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
BLGR Martin Ratio Rank: 41

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QLC vs. BLGR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) and Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QLC	BLGR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.28	1.42	+0.86
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.13	1.96	+1.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.25	+0.16
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.34	1.62	+1.72
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.18	6.00	+9.18

QLC vs. BLGR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QLC Sharpe Ratio is 2.28, which is higher than the BLGR Sharpe Ratio of 1.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QLC and BLGR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QLC vs. BLGR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QLC drawdown since its inception was -35.86%, which is greater than BLGR's maximum drawdown of -14.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QLC and BLGR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QLC	BLGR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.86%	-14.08%	-21.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.84%	-14.08%	+5.24%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-18.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-23.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-35.86%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.34%	-5.56%	+3.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.52%	-2.50%	-2.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.94%	3.79%	-1.85%

Volatility

QLC vs. BLGR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund (QLC) is 4.81%, while Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF (BLGR) has a volatility of 6.16%. This indicates that QLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BLGR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QLC	BLGR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.81%	6.16%	-1.35%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.33%	12.75%	-2.42%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.98%	16.07%	-3.09%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	16.92%	16.07%	+0.85%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.46%	16.07%	+2.39%

QLC vs. BLGR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QLC has a 0.25% expense ratio, which is higher than BLGR's 0.24% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

QLC vs. BLGR - Dividend Comparison

QLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.95%, more than BLGR's 0.24% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BLGR Bluemonte Large Cap Growth ETF	0.24%	0.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QLC FlexShares US Quality Large Cap Index Fund	0.95%	0.94%	1.03%	1.26%	1.46%	0.96%	1.40%	1.91%	1.82%	1.29%	1.80%	0.64%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QLC and BLGR in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.92, QLC and BLGR move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which is riskier, QLC or BLGR?

BLGR has higher volatility (6.16%) compared to QLC (4.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QLC dropped -35.86% vs BLGR's -14.08%.

Which ETF is better, QLC or BLGR?

On 1-year performance, QLC leads with 29.38% vs 22.68% for BLGR. On fees, BLGR is cheaper at 0.24% per year. On volatility, QLC has been the lower-risk option at 4.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QLC or BLGR?

Over the 1-year period, QLC has performed better with a 29.38% return vs 22.68%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QLC or BLGR?

BLGR is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for QLC.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QLC or BLGR?

QLC has the higher dividend yield at 0.95%, compared with 0.24% for BLGR.

What is the main difference between QLC and BLGR?

QLC is categorized as Large Cap Blend Equities, while BLGR is Large Cap Growth Equities. They also come from different issuers: Northern Trust and Bluemonte. Their fees differ too: 0.25% for QLC and 0.24% for BLGR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QLC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 1.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.