QIS vs. FSMSX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) and FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX).

QIS is an actively managed fund by Simplify. It was launched on Jul 10, 2023. FSMSX is managed by FS Investments. It was launched on May 15, 2017.

Performance

QIS vs. FSMSX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) and FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QIS vs. FSMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023
QIS Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF	-18.32%	-38.02%	0.19%	1.96%
FSMSX FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund	0.90%	4.13%	4.63%	3.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QIS achieves a -18.32% return, which is significantly lower than FSMSX's 0.90% return.

QIS

• 1D: -4.55%
• 1M: -14.21%
• YTD: -18.32%
• 6M: -36.75%
• 1Y: -47.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

FSMSX

• 1D: 0.18%
• 1M: -0.53%
• YTD: 0.90%
• 6M: 2.31%
• 1Y: 4.69%
• 3Y*: 4.46%
• 5Y*: 4.95%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QIS vs. FSMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than FSMSX's 1.89% expense ratio.

FSMSX

FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund

QIS

Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF

Return for Risk

QIS vs. FSMSX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QIS

QIS Risk / Return Rank: 0
QIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
QIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
QIS Omega Ratio Rank: 0
QIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
QIS Martin Ratio Rank: 1

FSMSX

FSMSX Risk / Return Rank: 80
FSMSX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 82
FSMSX Sortino Ratio Rank: 82
FSMSX Omega Ratio Rank: 80
FSMSX Calmar Ratio Rank: 85
FSMSX Martin Ratio Rank: 74

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QIS vs. FSMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) and FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QIS	FSMSX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-1.16	1.51	-2.67
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-1.70	2.09	-3.79
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.77	1.31	-0.53
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.91	2.10	-3.01
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-1.62	6.99	-8.61
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QIS vs. FSMSX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIS Sharpe Ratio is -1.16, which is lower than the FSMSX Sharpe Ratio of 1.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIS and FSMSX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QIS	FSMSX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-1.16	1.51	-2.67
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	1.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.80	0.81	-1.61

Correlation

The correlation between QIS and FSMSX is 0.05, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

QIS vs. FSMSX - Dividend Comparison

QIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.65%, less than FSMSX's 4.08% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QIS Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF	1.65%	3.37%	1.07%	3.29%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FSMSX FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund	4.08%	4.12%	2.48%	3.61%	4.12%	3.22%	0.77%	2.20%	0.82%

Drawdowns

QIS vs. FSMSX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIS drawdown since its inception was -52.12%, which is greater than FSMSX's maximum drawdown of -8.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIS and FSMSX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QIS	FSMSX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.12%	-8.94%	-43.18%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-51.77%	-2.32%	-49.45%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-4.13%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-52.11%	-0.62%	-51.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-11.42%	-1.66%	-9.76%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	29.06%	0.70%	+28.36%

Volatility

QIS vs. FSMSX - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) has a higher volatility of 11.26% compared to FS Multi-Strategy Alternatives Fund (FSMSX) at 1.28%. This indicates that QIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FSMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QIS	FSMSX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.26%	1.28%	+9.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.31%	2.00%	+23.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	40.80%	3.24%	+37.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.91%	4.63%	+22.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	26.91%	4.67%	+22.24%