QIS vs. GFSYX

In the year-to-date period, QIS achieves a -9.30% return, which is significantly lower than GFSYX's 2.52% return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

QIS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than GFSYX's 1.15% expense ratio.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current QIS Sharpe Ratio is -0.39, which is lower than the GFSYX Sharpe Ratio of 3.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIS and GFSYX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

QIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.57%, less than GFSYX's 8.33% yield.

The maximum QIS drawdown since its inception was -24.02%, which is greater than GFSYX's maximum drawdown of -10.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIS and GFSYX.

Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) has a higher volatility of 9.67% compared to GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX) at 0.75%. This indicates that QIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFSYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.