PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
QIS vs. GFSYX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


QISGFSYX
YTD Return-1.19%7.60%
1Y Return-1.55%-0.90%
Sharpe Ratio-0.05-0.14
Sortino Ratio0.01-0.10
Omega Ratio1.000.96
Calmar Ratio-0.08-0.13
Martin Ratio-0.21-0.21
Ulcer Index2.70%5.13%
Daily Std Dev11.22%8.10%
Max Drawdown-7.51%-10.03%
Current Drawdown-6.70%-1.09%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.0-0.0

The correlation between QIS and GFSYX is -0.05. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.

Performance

QIS vs. GFSYX - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, QIS achieves a -1.19% return, which is significantly lower than GFSYX's 7.60% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-4.00%-2.00%0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.87%
5.20%
QIS
GFSYX

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


QIS vs. GFSYX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is lower than GFSYX's 1.15% expense ratio.


GFSYX
GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund
Expense ratio chart for GFSYX: current value at 1.15% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.15%
Expense ratio chart for QIS: current value at 1.00% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%1.00%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

QIS vs. GFSYX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) and GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QIS
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for QIS, currently valued at -0.14, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.14
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for QIS, currently valued at -0.12, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.00-0.12
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for QIS, currently valued at 0.98, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.000.98
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for QIS, currently valued at -0.21, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.21
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for QIS, currently valued at -0.57, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-0.57
GFSYX
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for GFSYX, currently valued at -0.14, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.00-0.14
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for GFSYX, currently valued at -0.10, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.00-0.10
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for GFSYX, currently valued at 0.96, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.000.96
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for GFSYX, currently valued at -0.13, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.00-0.13
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for GFSYX, currently valued at -0.21, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.00-0.21

QIS vs. GFSYX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIS Sharpe Ratio is -0.05, which is higher than the GFSYX Sharpe Ratio of -0.14. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIS and GFSYX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.40-0.200.000.200.400.600.80Jul 14Jul 21Jul 28Aug 04Aug 11Aug 18Aug 25SeptemberSep 08Sep 15Sep 22Sep 29Oct 06Oct 13Oct 20Oct 27Nov 03Nov 10
-0.14
-0.14
QIS
GFSYX

Dividends

QIS vs. GFSYX - Dividend Comparison

QIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.39%, more than GFSYX's 3.80% yield.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017
QIS
Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF
4.39%3.29%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GFSYX
GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund
3.80%4.09%0.44%0.19%1.38%1.86%1.83%0.54%

Drawdowns

QIS vs. GFSYX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIS drawdown since its inception was -7.51%, smaller than the maximum GFSYX drawdown of -10.03%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIS and GFSYX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-6.70%
-1.09%
QIS
GFSYX

Volatility

QIS vs. GFSYX - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) has a higher volatility of 3.05% compared to GuideStone Funds Strategic Alternatives Fund (GFSYX) at 1.08%. This indicates that QIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GFSYX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


0.00%2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
3.05%
1.08%
QIS
GFSYX