QIS vs. BUCK
QIS (Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF) and BUCK (Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QIS is a Multistrategy fund actively managed by Simplify, while BUCK is a Government Bonds fund actively managed by Simplify. Both are actively managed. Over the past year, QIS returned -43.92% vs 7.46% for BUCK. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions. QIS charges 1.00%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for BUCK.
Performance
QIS vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QIS achieves a -16.55% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 1.99% return.
QIS
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -9.93%
- YTD
- -16.55%
- 6M
- -21.96%
- 1Y
- -43.92%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BUCK
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 0.43%
- YTD
- 1.99%
- 6M
- 1.92%
- 1Y
- 7.46%
- 3Y*
- 5.27%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QIS vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
QIS Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF | -16.55% | -38.02% | 0.19% | 1.96% |
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 1.99% | 4.13% | 7.25% | 1.89% |
Correlation
The correlation between QIS and BUCK is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023 | -0.04 |
QIS vs. BUCK - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QIS
BUCK
Technology
-
Industrials
-
Healthcare
-
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
-
Energy
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Basic Materials
-
Utilities
-
Technology
QIS
BUCK
-
Industrials
QIS
BUCK
-
Healthcare
QIS
BUCK
-
Financial Services
QIS
BUCK
Consumer Cyclical
QIS
BUCK
-
Energy
QIS
BUCK
-
Communication Services
QIS
BUCK
-
Real Estate
QIS
BUCK
-
Consumer Defensive
QIS
BUCK
-
Basic Materials
QIS
BUCK
-
Utilities
QIS
BUCK
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QIS vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank
QIS
BUCK
QIS vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QIS | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.32 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.80 | 1.51 | -0.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.87 | 5.73 | -6.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.46 | 30.33 | -31.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QIS | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -1.15 | 2.42 | -3.57 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.68 | 1.48 | -2.15 |
Drawdowns
QIS vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QIS drawdown since its inception was -55.49%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIS and BUCK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QIS | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -55.49% | -5.43% | -50.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -50.92% | -1.31% | -49.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -5.43% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -51.08% | 0.00% | -51.08% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -13.78% | -0.49% | -13.29% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 30.03% | 0.25% | +29.78% |
Volatility
QIS vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison
Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) has a higher volatility of 15.94% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.70%. This indicates that QIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QIS | BUCK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.94% | 0.70% | +15.24% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.76% | 1.52% | +28.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.28% | 3.14% | +35.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.24% | 3.48% | +25.76% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.24% | 3.48% | +25.76% |
QIS vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison
QIS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QIS vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison
QIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than BUCK's 7.41% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BUCK Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF | 7.41% | 7.59% | 8.84% | 4.84% | 0.59% |
QIS Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF | 1.61% | 3.37% | 1.07% | 3.29% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QIS and BUCK have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QIS has higher volatility (15.94%) compared to BUCK (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIS dropped -55.49% vs BUCK's -5.43%.
On 1-year performance, BUCK leads with 7.46% vs -43.92% for QIS. On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 1-year period, BUCK has performed better with a 7.46% return vs -43.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for QIS.
BUCK has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 1.61% for QIS.
QIS is categorized as Multistrategy, while BUCK is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for QIS and 0.35% for BUCK.
BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QIS and BUCK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer