PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QIS vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QIS vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QIS achieves a -16.55% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 1.99% return.


QIS

1D
-0.44%
1M
-9.93%
YTD
-16.55%
6M
-21.96%
1Y
-43.92%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.09%
1M
0.43%
YTD
1.99%
6M
1.92%
1Y
7.46%
3Y*
5.27%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QIS vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023
QIS
Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF
-16.55%-38.02%0.19%1.96%
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
1.99%4.13%7.25%1.89%

Correlation

The correlation between QIS and BUCK is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.08

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 12, 2023

-0.04

QIS vs. BUCK - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QIS
BUCK

Technology

24.7%

-

Industrials

15.8%

-

Healthcare

13.9%

-

Financial Services

10.0%
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

9.7%

-

Energy

6.8%

-

Communication Services

4.3%

-

Real Estate

4.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

4.0%

-

Basic Materials

3.9%

-

Utilities

2.9%

-

Technology

QIS
24.7%
BUCK

-

Industrials

QIS
15.8%
BUCK

-

Healthcare

QIS
13.9%
BUCK

-

Financial Services

QIS
10.0%
BUCK
100.0%

Consumer Cyclical

QIS
9.7%
BUCK

-

Energy

QIS
6.8%
BUCK

-

Communication Services

QIS
4.3%
BUCK

-

Real Estate

QIS
4.1%
BUCK

-

Consumer Defensive

QIS
4.0%
BUCK

-

Basic Materials

QIS
3.9%
BUCK

-

Utilities

QIS
2.9%
BUCK

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QIS vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QIS
QIS Risk / Return Rank: 11
Overall Rank
QIS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIS Sortino Ratio Rank: 11
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIS Omega Ratio Rank: 11
Omega Ratio Rank
QIS Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIS Martin Ratio Rank: 11
Martin Ratio Rank

BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QIS vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QISBUCKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-3.57

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-5.32

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.80

1.51

-0.71

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.87

5.73

-6.59

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-1.46

30.33

-31.79

QIS vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIS Sharpe Ratio is -1.15, which is lower than the BUCK Sharpe Ratio of 2.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIS and BUCK, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QISBUCKDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-1.15

2.42

-3.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.68

1.48

-2.15

Drawdowns

QIS vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIS drawdown since its inception was -55.49%, which is greater than BUCK's maximum drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIS and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QISBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-55.49%

-5.43%

-50.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-50.92%

-1.31%

-49.61%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-51.08%

0.00%

-51.08%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-13.78%

-0.49%

-13.29%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

30.03%

0.25%

+29.78%

Volatility

QIS vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison

Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF (QIS) has a higher volatility of 15.94% compared to Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK) at 0.70%. This indicates that QIS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BUCK based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QISBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.94%

0.70%

+15.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

29.76%

1.52%

+28.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

38.28%

3.14%

+35.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

29.24%

3.48%

+25.76%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.24%

3.48%

+25.76%

QIS vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIS has a 1.00% expense ratio, which is higher than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

QIS vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

QIS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.61%, less than BUCK's 7.41% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.41%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
QIS
Simplify Multi-Qis Alternative ETF
1.61%3.37%1.07%3.29%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


QIS and BUCK have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QIS has higher volatility (15.94%) compared to BUCK (0.70%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIS dropped -55.49% vs BUCK's -5.43%.

On 1-year performance, BUCK leads with 7.46% vs -43.92% for QIS. On fees, BUCK is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, BUCK has been the lower-risk option at 0.70%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, BUCK has performed better with a 7.46% return vs -43.92%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BUCK is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.00% for QIS.

BUCK has the higher dividend yield at 7.41%, compared with 1.61% for QIS.

QIS is categorized as Multistrategy, while BUCK is Government Bonds. Their fees differ too: 1.00% for QIS and 0.35% for BUCK.

BUCK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.42 vs -1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QIS and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer