QID vs. USD
QID (ProShares UltraShort QQQ) and USD (ProShares Ultra Semiconductors) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - QID tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-200%) while USD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QID returned -39.47%/yr vs 63.16%/yr for USD. At a correlation of -0.83, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
QID vs. USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QID achieves a -31.93% return, which is significantly lower than USD's 110.66% return. Over the past 10 years, QID has underperformed USD with an annualized return of -39.47%, while USD has yielded a comparatively higher 63.16% annualized return.
QID
- 1D
- 0.22%
- 1M
- -6.88%
- YTD
- -31.93%
- 6M
- -30.64%
- 1Y
- -49.05%
- 3Y*
- -38.43%
- 5Y*
- -31.45%
- 10Y*
- -39.47%
USD
- 1D
- 1.64%
- 1M
- 16.06%
- YTD
- 110.66%
- 6M
- 113.42%
- 1Y
- 253.70%
- 3Y*
- 123.90%
- 5Y*
- 68.54%
- 10Y*
- 63.16%
QID vs. USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ | -31.93% | -34.97% | -34.06% | -57.19% | 66.30% | -44.93% | -69.71% | -49.57% | -9.90% | -44.00% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 110.66% | 62.08% | 139.64% | 228.79% | -68.57% | 104.27% | 68.16% | 110.37% | -26.88% | 81.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between QID and USD is -0.81, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.81 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | -0.83 |
The correlation between QID and USD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.86 to -0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.
QID vs. USD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QID
USD
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
QID
USD
Basic Materials
QID
-
USD
-
Communication Services
QID
-
USD
-
Consumer Cyclical
QID
-
USD
-
Consumer Defensive
QID
-
USD
-
Energy
QID
-
USD
Healthcare
QID
-
USD
-
Industrials
QID
-
USD
-
Real Estate
QID
-
USD
-
Technology
QID
-
USD
Utilities
QID
-
USD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QID vs. USD — Risk / Return Rank
QID
USD
QID vs. USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QID | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -5.23 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -5.72 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.75 | 1.46 | -0.71 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -1.01 | 8.03 | -9.05 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.94 | 22.36 | -24.30 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QID vs. USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QID drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than USD's maximum drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QID and USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QID | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -88.63% | -11.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -48.52% | -31.80% | -16.72% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.50% | -64.46% | -15.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.72% | -77.85% | -10.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.37% | -77.85% | -21.52% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -2.68% | -97.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.02% | -32.30% | -54.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.66% | 11.40% | +15.26% |
Volatility
QID vs. USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) is 16.52%, while ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a volatility of 31.13%. This indicates that QID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QID | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.52% | 31.13% | -14.61% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 28.23% | 52.43% | -24.20% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 35.23% | 66.85% | -31.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.26% | 77.52% | -32.26% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.81% | 69.80% | -24.99% |
QID vs. USD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QID and USD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
QID vs. USD - Dividend Comparison
QID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, more than USD's 0.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ | 7.63% | 6.25% | 7.99% | 5.63% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 2.54% | 1.38% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 0.22% | 0.39% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.72% | 0.93% | 0.32% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QID and USD have a correlation of -0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USD has higher volatility (31.13%) compared to QID (16.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QID dropped -99.99% vs USD's -88.63%.
On 10-year performance, USD leads with 63.16% vs -39.47% for QID. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, QID has been the lower-risk option at 16.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USD has performed better with a 63.16% return vs -39.47%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QID and USD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
QID has the higher dividend yield at 7.63%, compared with 0.22% for USD.
QID tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-200%), while USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%).
USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.83 vs -1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QID and USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer