QID vs. USD
QID (ProShares UltraShort QQQ) and USD (ProShares Ultra Semiconductors) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - QID tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-200%) while USD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QID returned -38.34%/yr vs 58.67%/yr for USD. At a correlation of -0.83, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
QID vs. USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QID achieves a -28.70% return, which is significantly lower than USD's 85.14% return. Over the past 10 years, QID has underperformed USD with an annualized return of -38.34%, while USD has yielded a comparatively higher 58.67% annualized return.
QID
- 1D
- -0.64%
- 1M
- -0.57%
- 6M
- -25.87%
- YTD
- -28.70%
- 1Y
- -41.01%
- 3Y*
- -36.90%
- 5Y*
- -29.74%
- 10Y*
- -38.34%
USD
- 1D
- 3.09%
- 1M
- -0.93%
- 6M
- 76.15%
- YTD
- 85.14%
- 1Y
- 147.75%
- 3Y*
- 110.61%
- 5Y*
- 62.46%
- 10Y*
- 58.67%
QID vs. USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ | -28.70% | -34.97% | -34.06% | -57.19% | 66.30% | -44.93% | -69.71% | -49.57% | -9.90% | -44.00% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 85.14% | 62.08% | 139.64% | 228.79% | -68.57% | 104.27% | 68.16% | 110.37% | -26.88% | 81.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between QID and USD is -0.82, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.82 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | -0.83 |
The correlation between QID and USD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.87 to -0.82 - a consistent structural relationship.
QID vs. USD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QID
USD
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
QID
USD
Basic Materials
QID
-
USD
-
Communication Services
QID
-
USD
-
Consumer Cyclical
QID
-
USD
-
Consumer Defensive
QID
-
USD
-
Energy
QID
-
USD
Healthcare
QID
-
USD
-
Industrials
QID
-
USD
-
Real Estate
QID
-
USD
-
Technology
QID
-
USD
Utilities
QID
-
USD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QID vs. USD — Risk / Return Rank
QID
USD
QID vs. USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QID | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -3.24 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.12 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.81 | 1.32 | -0.51 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.91 | 4.70 | -5.62 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.81 | 12.39 | -14.19 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QID vs. USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QID drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than USD's maximum drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QID and USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QID | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -88.63% | -11.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.65% | -31.80% | -12.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.50% | -64.46% | -15.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.72% | -77.85% | -10.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.25% | -77.85% | -21.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -14.47% | -85.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.05% | -32.26% | -54.79% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 22.54% | 12.05% | +10.49% |
Volatility
QID vs. USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) is 17.52%, while ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a volatility of 32.27%. This indicates that QID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QID | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 17.52% | 32.27% | -14.75% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 30.45% | 57.13% | -26.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.93% | 69.99% | -33.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.55% | 78.11% | -32.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.81% | 69.98% | -25.17% |
QID vs. USD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QID and USD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
QID vs. USD - Dividend Comparison
QID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, more than USD's 0.31% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ | 8.26% | 6.25% | 7.99% | 5.63% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 2.54% | 1.38% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 0.31% | 0.39% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.72% | 0.93% | 0.32% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QID and USD have a correlation of -0.82, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USD has higher volatility (32.27%) compared to QID (17.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QID dropped -99.99% vs USD's -88.63%.
On 10-year performance, USD leads with 58.67% vs -38.34% for QID. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, QID has been the lower-risk option at 17.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USD has performed better with a 58.67% return vs -38.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QID and USD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
QID has the higher dividend yield at 8.26%, compared with 0.31% for USD.
QID tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-200%), while USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%).
USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.14 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QID and USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer