QID vs. USD
QID (ProShares UltraShort QQQ) and USD (ProShares Ultra Semiconductors) are both Leveraged Equities funds from ProShares - QID tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-200%) while USD tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, QID returned -37.32%/yr vs 54.19%/yr for USD. Their -0.83 correlation means they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
QID vs. USD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QID achieves a -21.02% return, which is significantly lower than USD's 50.25% return. Over the past 10 years, QID has underperformed USD with an annualized return of -37.32%, while USD has yielded a comparatively higher 54.19% annualized return.
QID
- 1D
- -1.22%
- 1M
- 6.86%
- 6M
- -19.38%
- YTD
- -21.02%
- 1Y
- -35.07%
- 3Y*
- -33.07%
- 5Y*
- -27.97%
- 10Y*
- -37.32%
- ALL TIME*
- -34.54%
USD
- 1D
- 1.44%
- 1M
- -10.08%
- 6M
- 34.80%
- YTD
- 50.25%
- 1Y
- 92.29%
- 3Y*
- 87.71%
- 5Y*
- 55.02%
- 10Y*
- 54.19%
- ALL TIME*
- 28.07%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $255.66M | $222.38M | $304.58M | |
| $68.86M | $72.62M | $95.81M |
QID vs. USD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ | -21.02% | -34.97% | -34.06% | -57.19% | 66.30% | -44.93% | -69.71% | -49.57% | -9.90% | -44.00% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 50.25% | 62.08% | 139.64% | 228.79% | -68.57% | 104.27% | 68.16% | 110.37% | -26.88% | 81.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between QID and USD is -0.84, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.84 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.84 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | -0.87 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | -0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007 | -0.83 |
The correlation between QID and USD has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.87 to -0.83 - a consistent structural relationship.
QID vs. USD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QID
USD
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
QID
USD
Basic Materials
QID
-
USD
-
Communication Services
QID
-
USD
-
Consumer Cyclical
QID
-
USD
-
Consumer Defensive
QID
-
USD
-
Energy
QID
-
USD
Healthcare
QID
-
USD
-
Industrials
QID
-
USD
-
Real Estate
QID
-
USD
-
Technology
QID
-
USD
Utilities
QID
-
USD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QID vs. USD — Risk / Return Rank
QID
USD
QID vs. USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) and ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QID | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.87 | 1.22 | -0.35 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.73 | 2.16 | -2.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -1.34 | 6.21 | -7.56 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QID vs. USD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QID drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than USD's maximum drawdown of -88.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QID and USD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QID | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.99% | -88.63% | -11.36% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -44.65% | -39.33% | -5.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -79.50% | -64.46% | -15.04% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -88.72% | -77.85% | -10.87% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -99.21% | -77.85% | -21.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.99% | -30.59% | -69.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.09% | -32.23% | -54.86% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.20% | 13.62% | +10.58% |
Volatility
QID vs. USD - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) is 13.93%, while ProShares Ultra Semiconductors (USD) has a volatility of 28.19%. This indicates that QID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QID | USD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.93% | 28.19% | -14.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 32.16% | 61.13% | -28.97% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 38.79% | 73.80% | -35.01% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 45.80% | 78.73% | -32.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 44.96% | 70.38% | -25.42% |
QID vs. USD - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both QID and USD have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
QID vs. USD - Dividend Comparison
QID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.46%, more than USD's 0.39% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ | 7.46% | 6.25% | 7.99% | 5.63% | 0.15% | 0.00% | 0.92% | 2.54% | 1.38% | 0.08% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
USD ProShares Ultra Semiconductors | 0.39% | 0.39% | 0.10% | 0.05% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.14% | 0.72% | 0.93% | 0.32% | 0.46% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QID and USD have a correlation of -0.84, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
USD has higher volatility (28.19%) compared to QID (13.93%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QID dropped -99.99% vs USD's -88.63%.
On 10-year performance, USD leads with 54.19% vs -37.32% for QID. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, QID has been the lower-risk option at 13.93%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, USD has performed better with a 54.19% return vs -37.32%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QID and USD have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
QID has the higher dividend yield at 7.46%, compared with 0.39% for USD.
QID tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-200%), while USD tracks Dow Jones U.S. Semiconductors Index (200%).
USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.15 vs -0.84), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QID and USD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer