QID vs. TSLG

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

QID (ProShares UltraShort QQQ) and TSLG (Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds. QID is passively managed, while TSLG is actively managed. Over the past year, QID returned -49.05% vs 14.94% for TSLG. At a correlation of -0.65, they often move in opposite directions. QID charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for TSLG.

Performance

QID vs. TSLG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QID achieves a -31.93% return, which is significantly lower than TSLG's -28.97% return.

QID

• 1D: 0.22%
• 1M: -6.88%
• YTD: -31.93%
• 6M: -30.64%
• 1Y: -49.05%
• 3Y*: -38.43%
• 5Y*: -31.45%
• 10Y*: -39.47%

TSLG

• 1D: 2.16%
• 1M: -11.85%
• YTD: -28.97%
• 6M: -40.18%
• 1Y: 14.94%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QID vs. TSLG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ	-31.93%	-34.97%	5.76%
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF	-28.97%	-26.70%	-14.82%

Correlation

The correlation between QID and TSLG is -0.59, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.59
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 13, 2024	-0.65

The correlation between QID and TSLG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.65 to -0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QID vs. TSLG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QID

QID Risk / Return Rank: 0
QID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 0
QID Sortino Ratio Rank: 0
QID Omega Ratio Rank: 0
QID Calmar Ratio Rank: 0
QID Martin Ratio Rank: 0

TSLG

TSLG Risk / Return Rank: 13
TSLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
TSLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
TSLG Omega Ratio Rank: 15
TSLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
TSLG Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QID vs. TSLG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) and Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QID	TSLG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.40	0.17	-1.57
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-2.37	0.88	-3.25
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.75	1.10	-0.35
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-1.01	0.27	-1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.94	0.54	-2.49

QID vs. TSLG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QID Sharpe Ratio is -1.40, which is lower than the TSLG Sharpe Ratio of 0.17. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QID and TSLG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QID vs. TSLG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QID drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than TSLG's maximum drawdown of -82.86%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QID and TSLG.

Drawdown Indicators

	QID	TSLG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.99%	-82.86%	-17.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-48.52%	-54.61%	+6.09%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-79.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-88.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.37%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.99%	-64.12%	-35.87%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-87.02%	-58.75%	-28.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	26.66%	27.52%	-0.86%

Volatility

QID vs. TSLG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) is 16.52%, while Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF (TSLG) has a volatility of 26.61%. This indicates that QID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TSLG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QID	TSLG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	16.52%	26.61%	-10.09%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	28.23%	56.16%	-27.93%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.23%	88.64%	-53.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.26%	114.81%	-69.55%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.81%	114.81%	-70.00%

QID vs. TSLG - Expense Ratio Comparison

QID has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than TSLG's 0.75% expense ratio.

Dividends

QID vs. TSLG - Dividend Comparison

QID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.63%, less than TSLG's 9.22% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ	7.63%	6.25%	7.99%	5.63%	0.15%	0.00%	0.92%	2.54%	1.38%	0.08%
TSLG Leverage Shares 2X Long TSLA Daily ETF	9.22%	6.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QID and TSLG in my portfolio?

QID and TSLG have a correlation of -0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QID or TSLG?

TSLG has higher volatility (26.61%) compared to QID (16.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QID dropped -99.99% vs TSLG's -82.86%.

Which ETF is better, QID or TSLG?

On 1-year performance, TSLG leads with 14.94% vs -49.05% for QID. On fees, TSLG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. On volatility, QID has been the lower-risk option at 16.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QID or TSLG?

Over the 1-year period, TSLG has performed better with a 14.94% return vs -49.05%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QID or TSLG?

TSLG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for QID.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QID or TSLG?

TSLG has the higher dividend yield at 9.22%, compared with 7.63% for QID.

What is the main difference between QID and TSLG?

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QID and 0.75% for TSLG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

TSLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.17 vs -1.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.