QID vs. MUU

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

QID (ProShares UltraShort QQQ) and MUU (Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds - QID tracks the NASDAQ-100 Index (-200%) while MUU tracks the Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QID returned -41.01% vs 3083.51% for MUU. At a correlation of -0.60, they often move in opposite directions. QID charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for MUU.

Performance

QID vs. MUU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QID achieves a -28.70% return, which is significantly lower than MUU's 642.75% return.

QID

• 1D: -0.64%
• 1M: -0.57%
• 6M: -25.87%
• YTD: -28.70%
• 1Y: -41.01%
• 3Y*: -36.90%
• 5Y*: -29.74%
• 10Y*: -38.34%

MUU

• 1D: -2.52%
• 1M: -10.27%
• 6M: 421.21%
• YTD: 642.75%
• 1Y: 3,083.51%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QID vs. MUU - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ	-28.70%	-34.97%	-6.32%
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	642.75%	599.03%	-40.91%

Correlation

The correlation between QID and MUU is -0.57, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.57
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 10, 2024	-0.60

The correlation between QID and MUU has been stable across timeframes, ranging from -0.60 to -0.57 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QID vs. MUU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QID

QID Risk / Return Rank: 1
QID Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1
QID Sortino Ratio Rank: 1
QID Omega Ratio Rank: 1
QID Calmar Ratio Rank: 1
QID Martin Ratio Rank: 0

MUU

MUU Risk / Return Rank: 99
MUU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Sortino Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Omega Ratio Rank: 97
MUU Calmar Ratio Rank: 100
MUU Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QID vs. MUU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) and Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QID	MUU	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-1.10	27.27	-28.38
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-1.72	5.80	-7.52
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.81	1.72	-0.91
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.91	75.03	-75.95
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-1.81	245.78	-247.58

QID vs. MUU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QID Sharpe Ratio is -1.10, which is lower than the MUU Sharpe Ratio of 27.27. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QID and MUU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QID vs. MUU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QID drawdown since its inception was -99.99%, which is greater than MUU's maximum drawdown of -75.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QID and MUU.

Drawdown Indicators

	QID	MUU	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-99.99%	-75.07%	-24.92%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-44.65%	-52.72%	+8.07%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-79.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-88.72%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-99.25%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-99.99%	-30.01%	-69.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-87.05%	-23.40%	-63.65%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	22.54%	16.41%	+6.13%

Volatility

QID vs. MUU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares UltraShort QQQ (QID) is 17.52%, while Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares (MUU) has a volatility of 67.23%. This indicates that QID experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than MUU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QID	MUU	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	17.52%	67.23%	-49.71%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	30.45%	116.08%	-85.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	36.93%	145.04%	-108.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	45.55%	138.03%	-92.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	44.81%	138.03%	-93.22%

QID vs. MUU - Expense Ratio Comparison

QID has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than MUU's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

QID vs. MUU - Dividend Comparison

QID's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.26%, more than MUU's 0.64% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
MUU Direxion Daily MU Bull 2X Shares	0.64%	4.27%	0.31%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QID ProShares UltraShort QQQ	8.26%	6.25%	7.99%	5.63%	0.15%	0.00%	0.92%	2.54%	1.38%	0.08%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QID and MUU in my portfolio?

QID and MUU have a correlation of -0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QID or MUU?

MUU has higher volatility (67.23%) compared to QID (17.52%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QID dropped -99.99% vs MUU's -75.07%.

Which ETF is better, QID or MUU?

On 1-year performance, MUU leads with 3083.51% vs -41.01% for QID. On fees, QID is cheaper at 0.95% per year. On volatility, QID has been the lower-risk option at 17.52%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QID or MUU?

Over the 1-year period, MUU has performed better with a 3083.51% return vs -41.01%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QID or MUU?

QID is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for MUU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QID or MUU?

QID has the higher dividend yield at 8.26%, compared with 0.64% for MUU.

What is the main difference between QID and MUU?

QID tracks NASDAQ-100 Index (-200%), while MUU tracks Micron Technology, Inc. (200% Daily). They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for QID and 1.01% for MUU.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

MUU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (27.27 vs -1.10), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.