PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QICLX vs. QMNNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QICLX vs. QMNNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR International Multi-Style Fund (QICLX) and AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QICLX achieves a 9.13% return, which is significantly higher than QMNNX's -5.98% return. Over the past 10 years, QICLX has outperformed QMNNX with an annualized return of 10.12%, while QMNNX has yielded a comparatively lower 6.01% annualized return.


QICLX

1D
-0.81%
1M
1.43%
YTD
9.13%
6M
12.27%
1Y
25.52%
3Y*
21.85%
5Y*
10.65%
10Y*
10.12%

QMNNX

1D
0.00%
1M
1.33%
YTD
-5.98%
6M
-3.37%
1Y
3.79%
3Y*
19.60%
5Y*
16.89%
10Y*
6.01%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QICLX vs. QMNNX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QICLX
AQR International Multi-Style Fund
9.13%42.80%4.86%19.55%-12.22%12.24%6.04%20.42%-14.75%24.96%
QMNNX
AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N
-5.98%26.19%25.43%16.30%27.07%17.38%-19.79%-11.55%-11.94%5.56%

Correlation

The correlation between QICLX and QMNNX is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.04

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.01

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 5, 2015

0.04

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QICLX vs. QMNNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QICLX
QICLX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
QICLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QICLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3333
Sortino Ratio Rank
QICLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
QICLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
QICLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

QMNNX
QMNNX Risk / Return Rank: 55
Overall Rank
QMNNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 66
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QMNNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
QMNNX Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
QMNNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
QMNNX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QICLX vs. QMNNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR International Multi-Style Fund (QICLX) and AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QICLXQMNNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.21

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.67

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.09

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

0.40

+1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.80

0.92

+7.88

QICLX vs. QMNNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QICLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.71, which is higher than the QMNNX Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QICLX and QMNNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QICLXQMNNXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.71

0.50

+1.21

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.66

1.81

-1.15

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.60

0.73

-0.12

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.44

0.83

-0.39

Drawdowns

QICLX vs. QMNNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QICLX drawdown since its inception was -36.19%, smaller than the maximum QMNNX drawdown of -39.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QICLX and QMNNX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QICLXQMNNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.19%

-39.22%

+3.03%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.11%

-8.41%

-2.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-8.41%

-5.43%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.88%

-13.98%

-14.90%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.19%

-39.22%

+3.03%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-6.37%

+4.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.68%

-10.61%

+2.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

3.63%

-0.69%

Volatility

QICLX vs. QMNNX - Volatility Comparison

AQR International Multi-Style Fund (QICLX) has a higher volatility of 4.66% compared to AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N (QMNNX) at 2.81%. This indicates that QICLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QMNNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QICLXQMNNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.66%

2.81%

+1.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.57%

5.24%

+7.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

6.72%

+8.45%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

9.40%

+6.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.82%

8.30%

+8.52%

QICLX vs. QMNNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QICLX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is lower than QMNNX's 5.28% expense ratio.


Dividends

QICLX vs. QMNNX - Dividend Comparison

QICLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.82%, more than QMNNX's 1.34% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QICLX
AQR International Multi-Style Fund
7.82%8.54%5.68%3.25%3.22%2.97%1.79%2.93%3.79%2.42%2.64%1.41%
QMNNX
AQR Equity Market Neutral Fund N
1.34%1.26%6.06%21.67%5.77%1.41%17.64%3.86%0.49%3.37%1.19%2.51%

Frequently Asked Questions


QICLX and QMNNX have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QICLX has higher volatility (4.66%) compared to QMNNX (2.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QICLX dropped -36.19% vs QMNNX's -39.22%.

QICLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.71 vs 0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QICLX and QMNNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer