PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QICLX vs. QDSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QICLX vs. QDSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR International Multi-Style Fund (QICLX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QICLX achieves a 10.02% return, which is significantly higher than QDSIX's 6.42% return.


QICLX

1D
0.49%
1M
3.34%
YTD
10.02%
6M
13.57%
1Y
26.86%
3Y*
22.18%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
10.21%

QDSIX

1D
0.07%
1M
1.50%
YTD
6.42%
6M
7.88%
1Y
15.05%
3Y*
13.91%
5Y*
11.18%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QICLX vs. QDSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QICLX
AQR International Multi-Style Fund
10.02%42.80%4.86%19.55%-12.22%12.24%16.96%
QDSIX
AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund
6.42%16.36%9.71%8.88%14.69%10.64%5.50%

Correlation

The correlation between QICLX and QDSIX is 0.47, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.47

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.39

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.26

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 11, 2020

0.30

The correlation between QICLX and QDSIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.26 (5 years) to 0.47 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QICLX vs. QDSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QICLX
QICLX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
QICLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QICLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
QICLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
QICLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
QICLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

QDSIX
QDSIX Risk / Return Rank: 9292
Overall Rank
QDSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QDSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9292
Sortino Ratio Rank
QDSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
QDSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
QDSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QICLX vs. QDSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR International Multi-Style Fund (QICLX) and AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QICLXQDSIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

3.05

-1.32

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.41

4.56

-2.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.59

-0.28

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

7.82

-5.47

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.86

22.82

-13.96

QICLX vs. QDSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QICLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is lower than the QDSIX Sharpe Ratio of 3.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QICLX and QDSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QICLXQDSIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

3.05

-1.32

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

1.47

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

1.66

-1.22

Drawdowns

QICLX vs. QDSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QICLX drawdown since its inception was -36.19%, which is greater than QDSIX's maximum drawdown of -7.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QICLX and QDSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QICLXQDSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.19%

-7.06%

-29.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.11%

-1.96%

-9.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-6.90%

-6.94%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.88%

-7.06%

-21.82%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

0.00%

-1.38%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.68%

-1.44%

-6.24%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

0.67%

+2.27%

Volatility

QICLX vs. QDSIX - Volatility Comparison

AQR International Multi-Style Fund (QICLX) has a higher volatility of 4.73% compared to AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund (QDSIX) at 1.38%. This indicates that QICLX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QDSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QICLXQDSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

1.38%

+3.35%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.55%

3.60%

+8.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

5.04%

+10.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

7.64%

+8.60%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.82%

7.32%

+9.50%

QICLX vs. QDSIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QICLX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than QDSIX's 0.20% expense ratio.


Dividends

QICLX vs. QDSIX - Dividend Comparison

QICLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.76%, more than QDSIX's 2.10% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QDSIX
AQR Diversifying Strategies Fund
2.10%2.23%0.00%11.35%8.22%6.07%1.93%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QICLX
AQR International Multi-Style Fund
7.76%8.54%5.68%3.25%3.22%2.97%1.79%2.93%3.79%2.42%2.64%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


QICLX and QDSIX have a correlation of 0.47, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

QICLX has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to QDSIX (1.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QICLX dropped -36.19% vs QDSIX's -7.06%.

QDSIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.05 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QICLX and QDSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer