PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QICLX vs. FHLFX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QICLX vs. FHLFX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in AQR International Multi-Style Fund (QICLX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with QICLX having a 10.02% return and FHLFX slightly lower at 9.53%.


QICLX

1D
0.49%
1M
3.34%
YTD
10.02%
6M
13.57%
1Y
26.86%
3Y*
22.18%
5Y*
11.03%
10Y*
10.21%

FHLFX

1D
0.42%
1M
4.09%
YTD
9.53%
6M
12.09%
1Y
22.51%
3Y*
17.18%
5Y*
8.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QICLX vs. FHLFX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
QICLX
AQR International Multi-Style Fund
10.02%42.80%4.86%19.55%-12.22%12.24%6.04%20.42%-11.36%
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
9.53%31.96%3.67%18.16%-14.17%11.23%8.09%21.66%-10.70%

Correlation

The correlation between QICLX and FHLFX is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.95

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.96

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 5, 2018

0.96

The correlation between QICLX and FHLFX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QICLX vs. FHLFX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QICLX
QICLX Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
QICLX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QICLX Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
QICLX Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
QICLX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
QICLX Martin Ratio Rank: 4141
Martin Ratio Rank

FHLFX
FHLFX Risk / Return Rank: 2727
Overall Rank
FHLFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2626
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FHLFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2626
Sortino Ratio Rank
FHLFX Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
FHLFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 2626
Calmar Ratio Rank
FHLFX Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QICLX vs. FHLFX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AQR International Multi-Style Fund (QICLX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QICLXFHLFXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.72

1.47

+0.26

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.41

2.10

+0.31

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.27

+0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.35

1.91

+0.44

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

8.86

7.17

+1.70

QICLX vs. FHLFX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QICLX Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the FHLFX Sharpe Ratio of 1.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QICLX and FHLFX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QICLXFHLFXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.72

1.47

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.56

+0.13

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.45

0.53

-0.08

Drawdowns

QICLX vs. FHLFX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QICLX drawdown since its inception was -36.19%, which is greater than FHLFX's maximum drawdown of -33.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QICLX and FHLFX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QICLXFHLFXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-36.19%

-33.58%

-2.61%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.11%

-11.37%

+0.26%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-13.84%

-13.62%

-0.22%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.88%

-29.36%

+0.48%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-36.19%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.38%

-0.42%

-0.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.68%

-6.11%

-1.57%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.94%

3.03%

-0.09%

Volatility

QICLX vs. FHLFX - Volatility Comparison

AQR International Multi-Style Fund (QICLX) and Fidelity Series International Index Fund (FHLFX) have volatilities of 4.73% and 4.64%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QICLXFHLFXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.73%

4.64%

+0.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.55%

12.08%

+0.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.17%

14.83%

+0.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

16.24%

15.98%

+0.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

16.82%

17.64%

-0.82%

QICLX vs. FHLFX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QICLX has a 0.56% expense ratio, which is higher than FHLFX's 0.01% expense ratio.


Dividends

QICLX vs. FHLFX - Dividend Comparison

QICLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.76%, more than FHLFX's 3.16% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FHLFX
Fidelity Series International Index Fund
3.16%3.46%2.98%2.86%2.60%2.47%1.92%1.95%0.62%0.00%0.00%0.00%
QICLX
AQR International Multi-Style Fund
7.76%8.54%5.68%3.25%3.22%2.97%1.79%2.93%3.79%2.42%2.64%1.41%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, QICLX and FHLFX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

QICLX has higher volatility (4.73%) compared to FHLFX (4.64%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QICLX dropped -36.19% vs FHLFX's -33.58%.

QICLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QICLX and FHLFX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer