PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QIBGX vs. SVAIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QIBGX vs. SVAIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund (SVAIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QIBGX achieves a 5.27% return, which is significantly lower than SVAIX's 8.13% return. Over the past 10 years, QIBGX has outperformed SVAIX with an annualized return of 11.23%, while SVAIX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.06% annualized return.


QIBGX

1D
-0.51%
1M
1.51%
YTD
5.27%
6M
6.42%
1Y
15.61%
3Y*
19.02%
5Y*
10.52%
10Y*
11.23%

SVAIX

1D
-0.58%
1M
-1.04%
YTD
8.13%
6M
8.36%
1Y
19.08%
3Y*
15.25%
5Y*
10.15%
10Y*
8.06%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QIBGX vs. SVAIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
QIBGX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund
5.27%14.68%28.30%14.26%-13.54%17.43%16.17%19.00%-2.96%14.12%
SVAIX
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund
8.13%15.26%16.47%-1.81%8.47%21.52%-7.88%19.59%-8.23%15.10%

Correlation

The correlation between QIBGX and SVAIX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.17

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.36

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.51

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.58

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2005

0.71

Over the past year, the correlation between QIBGX and SVAIX has dropped to 0.17 - well below their long-term average of 0.71, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QIBGX vs. SVAIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QIBGX
QIBGX Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
QIBGX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1818
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QIBGX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
QIBGX Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
QIBGX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
QIBGX Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank

SVAIX
SVAIX Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
SVAIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SVAIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
SVAIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4646
Omega Ratio Rank
SVAIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
SVAIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QIBGX vs. SVAIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund (SVAIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QIBGXSVAIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.48

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.37

0.00

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.46

4.96

-3.50

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.81

13.55

-9.74

QIBGX vs. SVAIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QIBGX Sharpe Ratio is 1.18, which is lower than the SVAIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QIBGX and SVAIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QIBGXSVAIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.18

2.23

-1.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

0.78

-0.10

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.79

0.53

+0.26

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.52

+0.12

Drawdowns

QIBGX vs. SVAIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QIBGX drawdown since its inception was -42.95%, smaller than the maximum SVAIX drawdown of -50.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIBGX and SVAIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QIBGXSVAIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-42.95%

-50.62%

+7.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.09%

-4.66%

-6.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-18.25%

-12.64%

-5.61%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-19.32%

-16.13%

-3.19%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-25.97%

-36.53%

+10.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.67%

-3.81%

+2.14%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.59%

-7.71%

+2.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.23%

2.60%

+1.63%

Volatility

QIBGX vs. SVAIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) is 2.27%, while Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund (SVAIX) has a volatility of 3.56%. This indicates that QIBGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SVAIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QIBGXSVAIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.27%

3.56%

-1.29%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.78%

7.34%

+5.44%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.68%

10.36%

+3.32%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

15.52%

13.63%

+1.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.21%

15.44%

-1.23%

QIBGX vs. SVAIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

QIBGX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SVAIX's 0.81% expense ratio.


Dividends

QIBGX vs. SVAIX - Dividend Comparison

QIBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.41%, more than SVAIX's 6.09% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QIBGX
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund
8.41%8.86%20.13%1.82%6.92%9.99%4.36%4.33%10.60%1.59%1.86%1.75%
SVAIX
Federated Hermes Strategic Value Dividend Fund
6.09%6.41%7.58%4.32%9.68%3.72%4.28%8.75%8.54%10.36%5.24%8.67%

Frequently Asked Questions


QIBGX and SVAIX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SVAIX has higher volatility (3.56%) compared to QIBGX (2.27%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIBGX dropped -42.95% vs SVAIX's -50.62%.

SVAIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 1.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QIBGX and SVAIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer