QIBGX vs. SICIX
Compare and contrast key facts about Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX).
QIBGX is managed by Federated. It was launched on Sep 30, 2002. SICIX is managed by SEI. It was launched on Nov 16, 2003.
Performance
QIBGX vs. SICIX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QIBGX vs. SICIX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QIBGX Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund | -4.82% | 14.68% | 28.30% | 14.26% | -13.54% | 17.43% | 16.17% | 19.00% | -2.96% | 14.12% |
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 0.36% | 8.12% | 5.52% | 5.29% | -6.23% | 4.13% | 2.62% | 9.36% | -2.07% | 5.13% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QIBGX achieves a -4.82% return, which is significantly lower than SICIX's 0.36% return. Over the past 10 years, QIBGX has outperformed SICIX with an annualized return of 10.22%, while SICIX has yielded a comparatively lower 3.36% annualized return.
QIBGX
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- -6.12%
- YTD
- -4.82%
- 6M
- -2.32%
- 1Y
- 9.56%
- 3Y*
- 15.19%
- 5Y*
- 9.56%
- 10Y*
- 10.22%
SICIX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -2.39%
- YTD
- 0.36%
- 6M
- 1.75%
- 1Y
- 5.89%
- 3Y*
- 5.80%
- 5Y*
- 3.22%
- 10Y*
- 3.36%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QIBGX vs. SICIX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QIBGX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than SICIX's 0.51% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QIBGX vs. SICIX — Risk / Return Rank
QIBGX
SICIX
QIBGX vs. SICIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QIBGX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.58 | 1.66 | -1.08 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.91 | 2.20 | -1.29 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.19 | 1.34 | -0.15 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.75 | 2.19 | -1.44 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.09 | 8.95 | -6.86 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QIBGX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 | 1.66 | -1.08 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 | 0.84 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.72 | 0.87 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.78 | -0.17 |
Correlation
The correlation between QIBGX and SICIX is 0.78, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QIBGX vs. SICIX - Dividend Comparison
QIBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.31%, more than SICIX's 2.86% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QIBGX Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund | 9.31% | 8.86% | 20.13% | 1.82% | 6.92% | 9.99% | 4.36% | 4.33% | 10.60% | 1.59% | 1.86% | 1.75% |
SICIX SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund | 2.86% | 2.87% | 3.67% | 2.80% | 4.69% | 3.46% | 1.84% | 2.91% | 1.80% | 1.81% | 1.64% | 1.97% |
Drawdowns
QIBGX vs. SICIX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QIBGX drawdown since its inception was -42.95%, which is greater than SICIX's maximum drawdown of -27.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIBGX and SICIX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QIBGX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.95% | -27.62% | -15.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.09% | -2.73% | -8.36% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.32% | -10.94% | -8.38% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.97% | -11.61% | -14.36% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.09% | -2.39% | -8.70% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.60% | -3.59% | -2.01% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.99% | 0.67% | +3.32% |
Volatility
QIBGX vs. SICIX - Volatility Comparison
Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) has a higher volatility of 3.14% compared to SEI Asset Allocation Trust Conservative Strategy Fund (SICIX) at 1.24%. This indicates that QIBGX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SICIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QIBGX | SICIX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 1.24% | +1.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.58% | 2.06% | +10.52% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.09% | 3.66% | +11.43% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.48% | 3.87% | +11.61% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.17% | 3.89% | +10.28% |