QIBGX vs. AYBLX
QIBGX (Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund) and AYBLX (Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund) are both Diversified Portfolio funds. Over the past 10 years, QIBGX returned 11.23%/yr vs 10.59%/yr for AYBLX. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QIBGX charges 1.06%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for AYBLX.
Performance
QIBGX vs. AYBLX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QIBGX achieves a 4.91% return, which is significantly lower than AYBLX's 14.22% return. Over the past 10 years, QIBGX has outperformed AYBLX with an annualized return of 11.23%, while AYBLX has yielded a comparatively lower 10.59% annualized return.
QIBGX
- 1D
- 0.81%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- YTD
- 4.91%
- 6M
- 4.96%
- 1Y
- 15.37%
- 3Y*
- 18.18%
- 5Y*
- 10.65%
- 10Y*
- 11.23%
AYBLX
- 1D
- 0.93%
- 1M
- 1.85%
- YTD
- 14.22%
- 6M
- 14.00%
- 1Y
- 33.22%
- 3Y*
- 17.09%
- 5Y*
- 9.89%
- 10Y*
- 10.59%
QIBGX vs. AYBLX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QIBGX Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund | 4.91% | 14.68% | 28.30% | 14.26% | -13.54% | 17.43% | 16.17% | 19.00% | -2.96% | 14.12% |
AYBLX Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund | 14.22% | 19.80% | 9.64% | 15.41% | -14.39% | 15.48% | 12.92% | 22.22% | -4.43% | 15.19% |
Correlation
The correlation between QIBGX and AYBLX is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.84 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2003 | 0.89 |
Over the past year, the correlation between QIBGX and AYBLX has dropped to 0.35 - well below their long-term average of 0.89, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QIBGX vs. AYBLX — Risk / Return Rank
QIBGX
AYBLX
QIBGX vs. AYBLX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) and Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QIBGX | AYBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.21 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.98 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.33 | 1.61 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.37 | 5.12 | -3.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 3.56 | 23.78 | -20.21 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QIBGX vs. AYBLX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QIBGX drawdown since its inception was -42.95%, which is greater than AYBLX's maximum drawdown of -36.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QIBGX and AYBLX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QIBGX | AYBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -42.95% | -36.28% | -6.67% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.09% | -6.41% | -4.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.25% | -13.39% | -4.86% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -19.32% | -20.26% | +0.94% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.97% | -24.24% | -1.73% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.01% | -0.32% | -1.69% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.58% | -3.78% | -1.80% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.26% | 1.38% | +2.88% |
Volatility
QIBGX vs. AYBLX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund (QIBGX) is 3.33%, while Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund (AYBLX) has a volatility of 3.74%. This indicates that QIBGX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AYBLX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QIBGX | AYBLX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.33% | 3.74% | -0.41% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.24% | 7.86% | -0.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.98% | 9.94% | +4.04% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.57% | 11.13% | +4.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 11.33% | +2.90% |
QIBGX vs. AYBLX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QIBGX has a 1.06% expense ratio, which is higher than AYBLX's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
QIBGX vs. AYBLX - Dividend Comparison
QIBGX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.44%, more than AYBLX's 3.24% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
AYBLX Pioneer Balanced ESG Fund | 3.24% | 3.58% | 2.59% | 1.76% | 3.23% | 8.61% | 4.12% | 6.03% | 9.97% | 9.42% | 2.63% | 4.14% |
QIBGX Federated Hermes MDT Balanced Fund | 8.44% | 8.86% | 20.13% | 1.82% | 6.92% | 9.99% | 4.36% | 4.33% | 10.60% | 1.59% | 1.86% | 1.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QIBGX and AYBLX have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
AYBLX has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to QIBGX (3.33%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QIBGX dropped -42.95% vs AYBLX's -36.28%.
AYBLX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.30 vs 1.09), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QIBGX and AYBLX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer