QGRW vs. GUNR

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) and GUNR (FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - QGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index, while GUNR is a Commodity Producers Equities fund tracking the Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QGRW returned 26.27%/yr vs 12.40%/yr for GUNR. At a 0.31 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QGRW charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for GUNR.

Performance

QGRW vs. GUNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) and FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QGRW achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly lower than GUNR's 15.74% return.

QGRW

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -2.31%
• YTD: 10.35%
• 6M: 11.58%
• 1Y: 29.61%
• 3Y*: 26.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GUNR

• 1D: 1.19%
• 1M: -4.60%
• YTD: 15.74%
• 6M: 17.02%
• 1Y: 32.88%
• 3Y*: 12.40%
• 5Y*: 9.47%
• 10Y*: 11.10%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QGRW vs. GUNR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	10.35%	19.20%	34.85%	56.05%	-3.07%
GUNR FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund	15.74%	30.03%	-8.37%	-2.40%	-0.89%

Correlation

The correlation between QGRW and GUNR is 0.23, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.23
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.29
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 15, 2022	0.31

QGRW vs. GUNR - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	QGRW	GUNR
Technology	52.1%	0.5%
Communication Services	17.8%	1.7%
Consumer Cyclical	12.4%	0.2%
Industrials	8.0%	2.3%
Healthcare	4.3%	-
Financial Services	4.1%	2.7%
Energy	0.6%	29.3%
Consumer Defensive	0.5%	11.5%
Utilities	0.4%	4.0%
Basic Materials	-	45.1%
Real Estate	-	0.2%

Return for Risk

QGRW vs. GUNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QGRW

QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 47
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 48
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 47

GUNR

GUNR Risk / Return Rank: 80
GUNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
GUNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 72
GUNR Omega Ratio Rank: 75
GUNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 87
GUNR Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QGRW vs. GUNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) and FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QGRW	GUNR	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	2.18	-0.66
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	2.79	-0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	1.38	-0.11
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	4.40	-2.60
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.86	16.53	-9.66

QGRW vs. GUNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QGRW Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is lower than the GUNR Sharpe Ratio of 2.18. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QGRW and GUNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QGRW vs. GUNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QGRW drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, smaller than the maximum GUNR drawdown of -45.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRW and GUNR.

Drawdown Indicators

	QGRW	GUNR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.40%	-45.64%	+21.24%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.44%	-7.77%	-7.67%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.40%	-19.59%	-4.81%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-24.06%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-43.04%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.67%	-5.39%	-0.28%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.27%	-10.39%	+7.12%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.04%	2.06%	+1.98%

Volatility

QGRW vs. GUNR - Volatility Comparison

WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) has a higher volatility of 7.09% compared to FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) at 5.11%. This indicates that QGRW's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than GUNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QGRW	GUNR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.09%	5.11%	+1.98%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.83%	13.13%	+1.70%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.25%	15.69%	+2.56%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.20%	19.06%	+2.14%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.20%	20.44%	+0.76%

QGRW vs. GUNR - Expense Ratio Comparison

QGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is lower than GUNR's 0.46% expense ratio.

Dividends

QGRW vs. GUNR - Dividend Comparison

QGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than GUNR's 2.31% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GUNR FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund	2.31%	2.81%	3.39%	3.55%	4.12%	3.61%	2.79%	3.25%	3.27%	2.00%	1.73%	4.50%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	0.08%	0.09%	0.14%	0.11%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QGRW and GUNR in my portfolio?

QGRW and GUNR have a correlation of 0.23, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QGRW or GUNR?

QGRW has higher volatility (7.09%) compared to GUNR (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRW dropped -24.40% vs GUNR's -45.64%.

Which ETF is better, QGRW or GUNR?

On 3-year performance, QGRW leads with 26.27% vs 12.40% for GUNR. On fees, QGRW is cheaper at 0.28% per year. On volatility, GUNR has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QGRW or GUNR?

Over the 3-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 26.27% return vs 12.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QGRW or GUNR?

QGRW is cheaper with a 0.28% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for GUNR.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QGRW or GUNR?

GUNR has the higher dividend yield at 2.31%, compared with 0.08% for QGRW.

What is the main difference between QGRW and GUNR?

QGRW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while GUNR is Commodity Producers Equities. QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index, while GUNR tracks Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and Northern Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QGRW and 0.46% for GUNR.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

GUNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.18 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.