GUNR vs. HAP
Compare and contrast key facts about FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) and VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF (HAP).
GUNR and HAP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. GUNR is a passively managed fund by Northern Trust that tracks the performance of the Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index. It was launched on Sep 16, 2011. HAP is a passively managed fund by VanEck that tracks the performance of the Van Eck Hard Assets Producers Index. It was launched on Aug 29, 2008. Both GUNR and HAP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: GUNR or HAP.
Key characteristics
| GUNR | HAP | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -3.48% | 0.74% |
| 1Y Return | 3.02% | 7.67% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | 3.18% | 3.31% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | 7.71% | 9.32% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | 5.11% | 5.89% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.24 | 0.58 |
| Sortino Ratio | 0.42 | 0.86 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.05 | 1.11 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.21 | 0.55 |
| Martin Ratio | 0.69 | 1.97 |
| Ulcer Index | 5.22% | 4.07% |
| Daily Std Dev | 15.02% | 13.96% |
| Max Drawdown | -45.64% | -50.73% |
| Current Drawdown | -13.37% | -7.96% |
Correlation
The correlation between GUNR and HAP is 0.95, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Performance
GUNR vs. HAP - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, GUNR achieves a -3.48% return, which is significantly lower than HAP's 0.74% return. Over the past 10 years, GUNR has underperformed HAP with an annualized return of 5.11%, while HAP has yielded a comparatively higher 5.89% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
GUNR vs. HAP - Expense Ratio Comparison
GUNR has a 0.46% expense ratio, which is lower than HAP's 0.50% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
GUNR vs. HAP - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) and VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF (HAP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
GUNR vs. HAP - Dividend Comparison
GUNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.55%, more than HAP's 3.25% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GUNR FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund | 3.55% | 3.55% | 4.12% | 3.61% | 2.79% | 3.25% | 3.28% | 2.00% | 1.73% | 4.50% | 2.80% | 2.03% |
HAP VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF | 3.25% | 3.27% | 3.28% | 2.16% | 2.45% | 2.69% | 2.85% | 2.02% | 1.99% | 3.00% | 2.51% | 2.22% |
Drawdowns
GUNR vs. HAP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum GUNR drawdown since its inception was -45.64%, smaller than the maximum HAP drawdown of -50.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for GUNR and HAP. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
GUNR vs. HAP - Volatility Comparison
FlexShares Morningstar Global Upstream Natural Resources Index Fund (GUNR) and VanEck Vectors Natural Resources ETF (HAP) have volatilities of 3.83% and 3.89%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.