QGRW vs. GARP
QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) and GARP (iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - QGRW tracks the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index while GARP tracks the MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, QGRW returned 27.65%/yr vs 32.09%/yr for GARP. With a 0.96 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. QGRW charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.15%/yr for GARP.
Performance
QGRW vs. GARP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGRW achieves a 11.27% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's 17.00% return.
QGRW
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 0.59%
- YTD
- 11.27%
- 6M
- 10.05%
- 1Y
- 29.71%
- 3Y*
- 27.65%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GARP
- 1D
- 1.23%
- 1M
- 3.36%
- YTD
- 17.00%
- 6M
- 16.58%
- 1Y
- 37.42%
- 3Y*
- 32.09%
- 5Y*
- 19.24%
- 10Y*
- —
QGRW vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 11.27% | 19.20% | 34.85% | 56.05% | -3.30% |
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 17.00% | 21.49% | 37.42% | 42.86% | -3.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRW and GARP is 0.94, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.96 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 16, 2022 | 0.96 |
The correlation between QGRW and GARP has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.94 to 0.96 - a consistent structural relationship.
QGRW vs. GARP - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QGRW
GARP
Technology
Communication Services
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Healthcare
Financial Services
Energy
Consumer Defensive
-
Utilities
Basic Materials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
QGRW
GARP
Communication Services
QGRW
GARP
Consumer Cyclical
QGRW
GARP
Industrials
QGRW
GARP
Healthcare
QGRW
GARP
Financial Services
QGRW
GARP
Energy
QGRW
GARP
Consumer Defensive
QGRW
GARP
-
Utilities
QGRW
GARP
Basic Materials
QGRW
-
GARP
Real Estate
QGRW
-
GARP
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QGRW vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank
QGRW
GARP
QGRW vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QGRW | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.35 | -0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.93 | 2.75 | -0.81 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.51 | 10.94 | -3.43 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QGRW | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.66 | 2.04 | -0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.88 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.57 | 0.86 | +0.71 |
Drawdowns
QGRW vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRW drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, smaller than the maximum GARP drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRW and GARP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRW | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.40% | -31.34% | +6.94% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.44% | -13.69% | -1.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.40% | -23.73% | -0.67% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.88% | -4.24% | -0.64% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.26% | -7.36% | +4.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.97% | 3.43% | +0.54% |
Volatility
QGRW vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison
WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) have volatilities of 6.50% and 6.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QGRW | GARP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.50% | 6.79% | -0.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 14.46% | 14.70% | -0.24% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.99% | 18.47% | -0.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 22.06% | -0.87% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.19% | 23.94% | -2.75% |
QGRW vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio.
Dividends
QGRW vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison
QGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, less than GARP's 0.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GARP iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF | 0.26% | 0.31% | 0.38% | 0.75% | 1.85% | 0.67% | 0.75% |
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund | 0.08% | 0.09% | 0.14% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.94, QGRW and GARP move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
GARP has higher volatility (6.79%) compared to QGRW (6.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRW dropped -24.40% vs GARP's -31.34%.
On 3-year performance, GARP leads with 32.09% vs 27.65% for QGRW. On fees, GARP is cheaper at 0.15% per year. On volatility, QGRW has been the lower-risk option at 6.50%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, GARP has performed better with a 32.09% return vs 27.65%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
GARP is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QGRW.
GARP has the higher dividend yield at 0.26%, compared with 0.08% for QGRW.
QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index, while GARP tracks MSCI USA Quality GARP Select Index. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QGRW and 0.15% for GARP.
GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.04 vs 1.66), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QGRW and GARP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer