QGRW vs. ETHA

Last updated Jun 13, 2026

QGRW (WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund) and ETHA (iShares Ethereum Trust ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QGRW is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index, while ETHA is a Cryptocurrency fund tracking the CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, QGRW returned 29.61% vs -34.33% for ETHA. A 0.52 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QGRW charges 0.28%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for ETHA.

Performance

QGRW vs. ETHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QGRW achieves a 10.35% return, which is significantly higher than ETHA's -43.96% return.

QGRW

• 1D: 0.15%
• 1M: -2.31%
• YTD: 10.35%
• 6M: 11.58%
• 1Y: 29.61%
• 3Y*: 26.27%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ETHA

• 1D: -1.02%
• 1M: -27.59%
• YTD: -43.96%
• 6M: -45.98%
• 1Y: -34.33%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QGRW vs. ETHA - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	10.35%	19.20%	9.46%
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF	-43.96%	-11.31%	-4.89%

Correlation

The correlation between QGRW and ETHA is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.51
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2024	0.52

The correlation between QGRW and ETHA has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.51 to 0.52 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

QGRW vs. ETHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QGRW

QGRW Risk / Return Rank: 47
QGRW Sharpe Ratio Rank: 50
QGRW Sortino Ratio Rank: 46
QGRW Omega Ratio Rank: 48
QGRW Calmar Ratio Rank: 41
QGRW Martin Ratio Rank: 47

ETHA

ETHA Risk / Return Rank: 5
ETHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5
ETHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 5
ETHA Omega Ratio Rank: 6
ETHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 5
ETHA Martin Ratio Rank: 5

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QGRW vs. ETHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) and iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	QGRW	ETHA	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.52	-0.56	+2.08
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.06	-0.51	+2.56
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.27	0.94	+0.33
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.80	-0.57	+2.37
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.86	-0.98	+7.84

QGRW vs. ETHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QGRW Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the ETHA Sharpe Ratio of -0.56. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QGRW and ETHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

QGRW vs. ETHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QGRW drawdown since its inception was -24.40%, smaller than the maximum ETHA drawdown of -67.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRW and ETHA.

Drawdown Indicators

	QGRW	ETHA	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.40%	-67.56%	+43.16%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.44%	-67.56%	+52.12%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.40%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.67%	-65.65%	+59.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.27%	-33.25%	+29.98%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.04%	39.22%	-35.18%

Volatility

QGRW vs. ETHA - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund (QGRW) is 7.09%, while iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) has a volatility of 17.30%. This indicates that QGRW experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QGRW	ETHA	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.09%	17.30%	-10.21%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.83%	46.58%	-31.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.25%	69.29%	-51.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	21.20%	72.65%	-51.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	21.20%	72.65%	-51.45%

QGRW vs. ETHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

QGRW has a 0.28% expense ratio, which is higher than ETHA's 0.25% expense ratio.

Dividends

QGRW vs. ETHA - Dividend Comparison

QGRW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.08%, while ETHA has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023
ETHA iShares Ethereum Trust ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
QGRW WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Fund	0.08%	0.09%	0.14%	0.11%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QGRW and ETHA in my portfolio?

QGRW and ETHA have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, QGRW or ETHA?

ETHA has higher volatility (17.30%) compared to QGRW (7.09%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRW dropped -24.40% vs ETHA's -67.56%.

Which ETF is better, QGRW or ETHA?

On 1-year performance, QGRW leads with 29.61% vs -34.33% for ETHA. On fees, ETHA is cheaper at 0.25% per year. On volatility, QGRW has been the lower-risk option at 7.09%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, QGRW or ETHA?

Over the 1-year period, QGRW has performed better with a 29.61% return vs -34.33%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, QGRW or ETHA?

ETHA is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.28% for QGRW.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QGRW or ETHA?

QGRW has the higher dividend yield at 0.08%, compared with 0.00% for ETHA.

What is the main difference between QGRW and ETHA?

QGRW is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while ETHA is Cryptocurrency. QGRW tracks WisdomTree U.S. Quality Growth Index, while ETHA tracks CME CF Ether Dollar Reference Rate - New York Variant. They also come from different issuers: WisdomTree and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.28% for QGRW and 0.25% for ETHA.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QGRW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.52 vs -0.56), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.