PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
ETHA vs. BMNR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

ETHA vs. BMNR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) and BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with ETHA having a -41.77% return and BMNR slightly higher at -41.58%.


ETHA

1D
1.40%
1M
-16.12%
YTD
-41.77%
6M
-41.90%
1Y
-28.52%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BMNR

1D
-1.73%
1M
-16.00%
YTD
-41.58%
6M
-48.99%
1Y
244.14%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

ETHA vs. BMNR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
ETHA
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF
-41.77%12.83%
BMNR
BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc.
-41.58%274.59%

Correlation

The correlation between ETHA and BMNR is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 5, 2025

0.71

The correlation between ETHA and BMNR has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.75 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

ETHA vs. BMNR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

ETHA
ETHA Risk / Return Rank: 66
Overall Rank
ETHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 66
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETHA Omega Ratio Rank: 66
Omega Ratio Rank
ETHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 55
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETHA Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank

BMNR
BMNR Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
BMNR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BMNR Sortino Ratio Rank: 9999
Sortino Ratio Rank
BMNR Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
BMNR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
BMNR Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

ETHA vs. BMNR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) and BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


ETHABMNRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.76

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-8.69

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

2.01

-1.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.42

2.78

-3.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.71

3.30

-4.01

ETHA vs. BMNR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current ETHA Sharpe Ratio is -0.41, which is lower than the BMNR Sharpe Ratio of 0.34. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of ETHA and BMNR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

ETHA vs. BMNR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum ETHA drawdown since its inception was -67.56%, smaller than the maximum BMNR drawdown of -88.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for ETHA and BMNR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


ETHABMNRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-67.56%

-88.41%

+20.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-67.56%

-88.41%

+20.85%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-64.31%

-88.25%

+23.94%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-33.57%

-71.16%

+37.59%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.19%

74.36%

-34.17%

Volatility

ETHA vs. BMNR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares Ethereum Trust ETF (ETHA) is 19.68%, while BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc. (BMNR) has a volatility of 21.23%. This indicates that ETHA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BMNR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


ETHABMNRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

19.68%

21.23%

-1.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

46.99%

59.44%

-12.45%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

69.34%

718.74%

-649.40%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

72.67%

703.98%

-631.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

72.67%

703.98%

-631.31%

Dividends

ETHA vs. BMNR - Dividend Comparison

ETHA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BMNR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.06%.


PositionTTM2025
BMNR
BitMine Immersion Technologies, Inc.
0.06%0.04%
ETHA
iShares Ethereum Trust ETF
0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


ETHA and BMNR have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BMNR has higher volatility (21.23%) compared to ETHA (19.68%). In terms of maximum drawdown, ETHA dropped -67.56% vs BMNR's -88.41%.

BMNR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.34 vs -0.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for ETHA and BMNR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer