QGRPX vs. SWLGX
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX).
QGRPX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Jul 8, 2020. SWLGX is a passively managed fund by Charles Schwab that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Growth Index. It was launched on Dec 20, 2017.
Performance
QGRPX vs. SWLGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QGRPX vs. SWLGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRPX UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund | -14.31% | 15.51% | 25.13% | 35.52% | -25.57% | 29.14% | 14.62% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | -13.06% | 18.55% | 33.30% | 42.67% | -29.17% | 27.55% | 20.07% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGRPX achieves a -14.31% return, which is significantly lower than SWLGX's -13.06% return.
QGRPX
- 1D
- -0.31%
- 1M
- -9.01%
- YTD
- -14.31%
- 6M
- -13.51%
- 1Y
- 6.80%
- 3Y*
- 15.45%
- 5Y*
- 9.25%
- 10Y*
- —
SWLGX
- 1D
- -0.46%
- 1M
- -8.63%
- YTD
- -13.06%
- 6M
- -12.07%
- 1Y
- 14.45%
- 3Y*
- 19.67%
- 5Y*
- 11.90%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QGRPX vs. SWLGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRPX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SWLGX's 0.04% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QGRPX vs. SWLGX — Risk / Return Rank
QGRPX
SWLGX
QGRPX vs. SWLGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QGRPX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.37 | 0.66 | -0.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.69 | 1.10 | -0.41 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.15 | -0.06 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.09 | 0.72 | -0.63 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.27 | 2.51 | -2.24 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QGRPX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.37 | 0.66 | -0.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.56 | -0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.60 | 0.68 | -0.08 |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRPX and SWLGX is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QGRPX vs. SWLGX - Dividend Comparison
QGRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, more than SWLGX's 0.52% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRPX UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund | 7.19% | 6.16% | 3.62% | 0.42% | 1.00% | 2.84% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SWLGX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund | 0.52% | 0.46% | 0.52% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.76% | 0.67% | 0.96% | 1.03% |
Drawdowns
QGRPX vs. SWLGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRPX drawdown since its inception was -30.28%, smaller than the maximum SWLGX drawdown of -32.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRPX and SWLGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRPX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.28% | -32.69% | +2.41% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.45% | -16.16% | -1.29% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.28% | -32.69% | +2.41% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -17.45% | -16.16% | -1.29% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.64% | -7.13% | -0.51% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.58% | 4.62% | +0.96% |
Volatility
QGRPX vs. SWLGX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) is 4.65%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Growth Index Fund (SWLGX) has a volatility of 5.38%. This indicates that QGRPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SWLGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QGRPX | SWLGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.65% | 5.38% | -0.73% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.82% | 11.82% | -1.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.87% | 22.31% | -1.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.54% | 21.47% | -1.93% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.38% | 22.78% | -3.40% |