PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QGRPX vs. GARP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QGRPX vs. GARP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QGRPX achieves a -0.43% return, which is significantly lower than GARP's 16.17% return.


QGRPX

1D
-1.53%
1M
-2.51%
YTD
-0.43%
6M
-1.11%
1Y
11.21%
3Y*
18.21%
5Y*
10.61%
10Y*

GARP

1D
-2.76%
1M
0.95%
YTD
16.17%
6M
14.60%
1Y
36.49%
3Y*
30.82%
5Y*
18.36%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QGRPX vs. GARP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QGRPX
UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund
-0.43%15.51%25.13%35.52%-25.57%29.14%14.62%
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
16.17%21.49%37.42%42.86%-26.75%27.99%19.43%

Correlation

The correlation between QGRPX and GARP is 0.78, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.85

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.90

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 9, 2020

0.90

The correlation between QGRPX and GARP shifts across timeframes, from 0.78 (1 year) to 0.90 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QGRPX vs. GARP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QGRPX
QGRPX Risk / Return Rank: 1111
Overall Rank
QGRPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRPX Omega Ratio Rank: 1212
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRPX Martin Ratio Rank: 99
Martin Ratio Rank

GARP
GARP Risk / Return Rank: 5757
Overall Rank
GARP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GARP Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
GARP Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
GARP Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
GARP Martin Ratio Rank: 6060
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QGRPX vs. GARP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) and iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QGRPXGARPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.16

1.33

-0.17

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

2.68

-1.91

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

2.41

10.39

-7.98

QGRPX vs. GARP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QGRPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.88, which is lower than the GARP Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QGRPX and GARP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QGRPX vs. GARP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QGRPX drawdown since its inception was -30.28%, roughly equal to the maximum GARP drawdown of -31.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRPX and GARP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QGRPXGARPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.28%

-31.34%

+1.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.45%

-13.69%

-3.76%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.03%

-23.73%

+2.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.28%

-30.61%

+0.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.94%

-4.93%

-0.01%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.53%

-7.33%

-0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.37%

3.52%

+1.85%

Volatility

QGRPX vs. GARP - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) is 5.49%, while iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF (GARP) has a volatility of 8.62%. This indicates that QGRPX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GARP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QGRPXGARPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.49%

8.62%

-3.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.36%

15.52%

-3.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

15.31%

19.23%

-3.92%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.72%

22.22%

-2.50%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.32%

23.98%

-4.66%

QGRPX vs. GARP - Expense Ratio Comparison

QGRPX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than GARP's 0.15% expense ratio.


Dividends

QGRPX vs. GARP - Dividend Comparison

QGRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.19%, more than GARP's 0.27% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
GARP
iShares MSCI USA Quality GARP ETF
0.27%0.31%0.38%0.75%1.85%0.67%0.75%
QGRPX
UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund
6.19%6.16%3.62%0.42%1.00%2.84%0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


QGRPX and GARP have a correlation of 0.78, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GARP has higher volatility (8.62%) compared to QGRPX (5.49%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRPX dropped -30.28% vs GARP's -31.34%.

GARP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.88), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QGRPX and GARP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer