PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QGRPX vs. DVRUX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QGRPX vs. DVRUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) and UBS US Dividend Ruler Fund (DVRUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QGRPX achieves a 4.11% return, which is significantly lower than DVRUX's 11.72% return.


QGRPX

1D
-0.61%
1M
5.18%
YTD
4.11%
6M
3.50%
1Y
17.94%
3Y*
20.49%
5Y*
12.43%
10Y*

DVRUX

1D
1.22%
1M
4.84%
YTD
11.72%
6M
10.94%
1Y
24.66%
3Y*
19.58%
5Y*
12.85%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QGRPX vs. DVRUX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
QGRPX
UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund
4.11%15.51%25.13%35.52%-25.57%29.14%14.62%
DVRUX
UBS US Dividend Ruler Fund
11.72%16.53%20.96%13.56%-6.94%23.26%15.34%

Correlation

The correlation between QGRPX and DVRUX is 0.69, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.69

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.77

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.82

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2020

0.81

The correlation between QGRPX and DVRUX shifts across timeframes, from 0.69 (1 year) to 0.82 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QGRPX vs. DVRUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QGRPX
QGRPX Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
QGRPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QGRPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
QGRPX Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
QGRPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
QGRPX Martin Ratio Rank: 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

DVRUX
DVRUX Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DVRUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DVRUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
DVRUX Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
DVRUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7575
Calmar Ratio Rank
DVRUX Martin Ratio Rank: 6767
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QGRPX vs. DVRUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) and UBS US Dividend Ruler Fund (DVRUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QGRPXDVRUXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.39

2.48

-1.09

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.99

3.60

-1.61

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.45

-0.21

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.16

3.40

-2.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

3.68

13.00

-9.32

QGRPX vs. DVRUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QGRPX Sharpe Ratio is 1.39, which is lower than the DVRUX Sharpe Ratio of 2.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QGRPX and DVRUX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QGRPXDVRUXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.39

2.48

-1.09

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.65

0.89

-0.24

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

1.09

-0.31

Drawdowns

QGRPX vs. DVRUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QGRPX drawdown since its inception was -30.28%, which is greater than DVRUX's maximum drawdown of -19.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRPX and DVRUX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QGRPXDVRUXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-30.28%

-19.06%

-11.22%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-17.45%

-8.14%

-9.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.03%

-16.13%

-4.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.28%

-19.06%

-11.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.61%

0.00%

-0.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.56%

-3.46%

-4.10%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.29%

2.07%

+3.22%

Volatility

QGRPX vs. DVRUX - Volatility Comparison

UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) and UBS US Dividend Ruler Fund (DVRUX) have volatilities of 3.16% and 3.16%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QGRPXDVRUXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.16%

3.16%

0.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.75%

9.07%

+2.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.54%

11.20%

+3.34%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.60%

14.78%

+4.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.29%

14.71%

+4.58%

QGRPX vs. DVRUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QGRPX and DVRUX have an expense ratio of 0.50%.


Dividends

QGRPX vs. DVRUX - Dividend Comparison

QGRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.92%, less than DVRUX's 6.97% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
DVRUX
UBS US Dividend Ruler Fund
6.97%7.79%5.17%2.94%2.49%2.82%0.90%
QGRPX
UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund
5.92%6.16%3.62%0.42%1.00%2.84%0.37%

Frequently Asked Questions


QGRPX and DVRUX have a correlation of 0.69, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DVRUX has higher volatility (3.16%) compared to QGRPX (3.16%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRPX dropped -30.28% vs DVRUX's -19.06%.

DVRUX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.48 vs 1.39), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QGRPX and DVRUX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer