QGRPX vs. DVRUX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) and UBS US Dividend Ruler Fund (DVRUX).

QGRPX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Jul 8, 2020. DVRUX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Jul 8, 2020.

Performance

QGRPX vs. DVRUX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) and UBS US Dividend Ruler Fund (DVRUX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

QGRPX vs. DVRUX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QGRPX UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund	-14.31%	15.51%	25.13%	35.52%	-25.57%	29.14%	14.62%
DVRUX UBS US Dividend Ruler Fund	-4.16%	16.53%	20.96%	13.56%	-6.94%	23.26%	15.34%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QGRPX achieves a -14.31% return, which is significantly lower than DVRUX's -4.16% return.

QGRPX

• 1D: -0.31%
• 1M: -8.81%
• YTD: -14.31%
• 6M: -13.91%
• 1Y: 6.00%
• 3Y*: 15.45%
• 5Y*: 9.25%
• 10Y*: —

DVRUX

• 1D: -0.30%
• 1M: -7.62%
• YTD: -4.16%
• 6M: -5.08%
• 1Y: 13.92%
• 3Y*: 14.45%
• 5Y*: 10.57%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QGRPX vs. DVRUX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both QGRPX and DVRUX have an expense ratio of 0.50%.

QGRPX

UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund

DVRUX

UBS US Dividend Ruler Fund

Return for Risk

QGRPX vs. DVRUX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QGRPX

QGRPX Risk / Return Rank: 12
QGRPX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 14
QGRPX Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
QGRPX Omega Ratio Rank: 16
QGRPX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
QGRPX Martin Ratio Rank: 8

DVRUX

DVRUX Risk / Return Rank: 47
DVRUX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
DVRUX Sortino Ratio Rank: 60
DVRUX Omega Ratio Rank: 57
DVRUX Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
DVRUX Martin Ratio Rank: 35

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QGRPX vs. DVRUX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) and UBS US Dividend Ruler Fund (DVRUX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	QGRPX	DVRUX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.37	1.00	-0.63
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.69	1.54	-0.85
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.22	-0.13
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.09	0.90	-0.81
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	0.27	3.69	-3.41
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

QGRPX vs. DVRUX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QGRPX Sharpe Ratio is 0.37, which is lower than the DVRUX Sharpe Ratio of 1.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QGRPX and DVRUX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	QGRPX	DVRUX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.37	1.00	-0.63
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.48	0.73	-0.25
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.60	0.91	-0.31

Correlation

The correlation between QGRPX and DVRUX is 0.82, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

QGRPX vs. DVRUX - Dividend Comparison

QGRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.19%, less than DVRUX's 8.12% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
QGRPX UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund	7.19%	6.16%	3.62%	0.42%	1.00%	2.84%	0.37%
DVRUX UBS US Dividend Ruler Fund	8.12%	7.79%	5.17%	2.94%	2.49%	2.82%	0.90%

Drawdowns

QGRPX vs. DVRUX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QGRPX drawdown since its inception was -30.28%, which is greater than DVRUX's maximum drawdown of -19.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRPX and DVRUX.

Drawdown Indicators

	QGRPX	DVRUX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-30.28%	-19.06%	-11.22%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.45%	-9.94%	-7.51%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-30.28%	-19.06%	-11.22%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-17.45%	-8.14%	-9.31%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.64%	-3.53%	-4.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.58%	3.04%	+2.54%

Volatility

QGRPX vs. DVRUX - Volatility Comparison

UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) has a higher volatility of 4.65% compared to UBS US Dividend Ruler Fund (DVRUX) at 3.57%. This indicates that QGRPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DVRUX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	QGRPX	DVRUX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.65%	3.57%	+1.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.82%	8.00%	+2.82%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.87%	16.24%	+4.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.54%	14.71%	+4.83%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.38%	14.76%	+4.62%