QGRPX vs. SPHQ
Compare and contrast key facts about UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ).
QGRPX is managed by UBS. It was launched on Jul 8, 2020. SPHQ is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Quality Index. It was launched on Dec 6, 2005.
Performance
QGRPX vs. SPHQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
QGRPX vs. SPHQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRPX UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund | -11.21% | 15.51% | 25.13% | 35.52% | -25.57% | 29.14% | 14.62% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.46% | 13.25% | 25.44% | 24.83% | -15.76% | 28.03% | 17.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGRPX achieves a -11.21% return, which is significantly lower than SPHQ's 1.46% return.
QGRPX
- 1D
- 3.61%
- 1M
- -5.51%
- YTD
- -11.21%
- 6M
- -10.79%
- 1Y
- 9.83%
- 3Y*
- 16.82%
- 5Y*
- 9.75%
- 10Y*
- —
SPHQ
- 1D
- 0.89%
- 1M
- -5.57%
- YTD
- 1.46%
- 6M
- 3.57%
- 1Y
- 16.02%
- 3Y*
- 18.54%
- 5Y*
- 12.70%
- 10Y*
- 13.63%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
QGRPX vs. SPHQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRPX has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SPHQ's 0.15% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
QGRPX vs. SPHQ — Risk / Return Rank
QGRPX
SPHQ
QGRPX vs. SPHQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) and Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QGRPX | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.54 | 0.94 | -0.39 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.95 | 1.44 | -0.49 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.20 | -0.07 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.21 | 1.45 | -1.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.68 | 6.35 | -5.67 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QGRPX | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 | 0.94 | -0.39 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.51 | 0.78 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.77 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.63 | 0.50 | +0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRPX and SPHQ is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
QGRPX vs. SPHQ - Dividend Comparison
QGRPX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 6.94%, more than SPHQ's 1.18% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRPX UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund | 6.94% | 6.16% | 3.62% | 0.42% | 1.00% | 2.84% | 0.37% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SPHQ Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF | 1.18% | 1.09% | 1.15% | 1.42% | 1.85% | 1.19% | 1.55% | 1.51% | 1.85% | 1.57% | 1.67% | 2.29% |
Drawdowns
QGRPX vs. SPHQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRPX drawdown since its inception was -30.28%, smaller than the maximum SPHQ drawdown of -57.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRPX and SPHQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRPX | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -30.28% | -57.83% | +27.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -17.45% | -10.84% | -6.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -30.28% | -25.04% | -5.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -31.60% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -14.47% | -5.92% | -8.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.65% | -10.78% | +3.13% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.30% | 2.48% | +2.82% |
Volatility
QGRPX vs. SPHQ - Volatility Comparison
UBS US Quality Growth At Reasonable Price Fund (QGRPX) has a higher volatility of 6.13% compared to Invesco S&P 500 Quality ETF (SPHQ) at 5.32%. This indicates that QGRPX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| QGRPX | SPHQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.13% | 5.32% | +0.81% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.43% | 9.67% | +1.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.16% | 17.13% | +4.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.60% | 16.40% | +3.20% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.43% | 17.81% | +1.62% |