QGRO vs. VFMV
QGRO (American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF) and VFMV (Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR), while VFMV is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Vanguard. QGRO is passively managed, while VFMV is actively managed. Over the past 5 years, QGRO returned 11.72%/yr vs 9.52%/yr for VFMV. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QGRO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for VFMV.
Performance
QGRO vs. VFMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGRO achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than VFMV's 7.46% return.
QGRO
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- 20.35%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- —
VFMV
- 1D
- -0.49%
- 1M
- 0.03%
- YTD
- 7.46%
- 6M
- 7.72%
- 1Y
- 11.60%
- 3Y*
- 13.97%
- 5Y*
- 9.52%
- 10Y*
- —
QGRO vs. VFMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.09% | 15.18% | 31.42% | 32.42% | -24.54% | 24.57% | 37.99% | 35.09% | -16.85% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 7.46% | 10.52% | 16.91% | 8.86% | -5.73% | 20.75% | -0.19% | 27.26% | -11.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRO and VFMV is 0.65, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 13, 2018 | 0.74 |
The correlation between QGRO and VFMV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.65 to 0.74 - a consistent structural relationship.
QGRO vs. VFMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QGRO
VFMV
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Technology
QGRO
VFMV
Industrials
QGRO
VFMV
Healthcare
QGRO
VFMV
Consumer Cyclical
QGRO
VFMV
Communication Services
QGRO
VFMV
Financial Services
QGRO
VFMV
Consumer Defensive
QGRO
VFMV
Energy
QGRO
VFMV
Utilities
QGRO
VFMV
Real Estate
QGRO
VFMV
Basic Materials
QGRO
VFMV
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QGRO vs. VFMV — Risk / Return Rank
QGRO
VFMV
QGRO vs. VFMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QGRO | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.86 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.23 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 1.94 | -1.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.78 | 7.57 | -5.79 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QGRO | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 1.32 | -0.86 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.81 | -0.26 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.68 | -0.03 |
Drawdowns
QGRO vs. VFMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRO drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, roughly equal to the maximum VFMV drawdown of -33.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRO and VFMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRO | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.56% | -33.64% | +1.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -6.00% | -7.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.82% | -10.35% | -13.47% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.86% | -15.41% | -16.45% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -2.00% | -0.71% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -3.63% | -4.04% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 1.53% | +2.51% |
Volatility
QGRO vs. VFMV - Volatility Comparison
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF (VFMV) at 2.21%. This indicates that QGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QGRO | VFMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 2.21% | +2.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.03% | 6.37% | +5.66% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.58% | 8.83% | +6.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.09% | 11.75% | +9.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 14.25% | +8.68% |
QGRO vs. VFMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than VFMV's 0.13% expense ratio.
Dividends
QGRO vs. VFMV - Dividend Comparison
QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than VFMV's 1.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.20% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% |
VFMV Vanguard U.S. Minimum Volatility ETF | 1.95% | 2.12% | 1.46% | 2.20% | 2.08% | 1.31% | 2.14% | 2.43% | 2.29% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QGRO and VFMV have a correlation of 0.65, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QGRO has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to VFMV (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRO dropped -32.56% vs VFMV's -33.64%.
On 5-year performance, QGRO leads with 11.72% vs 9.52% for VFMV. On fees, VFMV is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, VFMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QGRO has performed better with a 11.72% return vs 9.52%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VFMV is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for QGRO.
VFMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.95%, compared with 0.20% for QGRO.
QGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while VFMV is Mid Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QGRO and 0.13% for VFMV.
VFMV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.32 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QGRO and VFMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer