QGRO vs. PGHY
QGRO (American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF) and PGHY (Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR), while PGHY is a High Yield Bonds fund tracking the DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QGRO returned 11.72%/yr vs 4.49%/yr for PGHY. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. QGRO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for PGHY.
Performance
QGRO vs. PGHY - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGRO achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than PGHY's 2.18% return.
QGRO
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- 20.35%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- —
PGHY
- 1D
- 0.25%
- 1M
- -0.40%
- YTD
- 2.18%
- 6M
- 2.62%
- 1Y
- 7.49%
- 3Y*
- 8.64%
- 5Y*
- 4.49%
- 10Y*
- 4.32%
QGRO vs. PGHY - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.09% | 15.18% | 31.42% | 32.42% | -24.54% | 24.57% | 37.99% | 35.09% | -16.08% |
PGHY Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 2.18% | 8.88% | 8.39% | 10.15% | -5.50% | 1.22% | 3.04% | 5.87% | -1.04% |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRO and PGHY is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 12, 2018 | 0.34 |
QGRO vs. PGHY - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QGRO
PGHY
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
QGRO
PGHY
Industrials
QGRO
PGHY
Healthcare
QGRO
PGHY
Consumer Cyclical
QGRO
PGHY
Communication Services
QGRO
PGHY
Financial Services
QGRO
PGHY
Consumer Defensive
QGRO
PGHY
Energy
QGRO
PGHY
Utilities
QGRO
PGHY
Real Estate
QGRO
PGHY
Basic Materials
QGRO
PGHY
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QGRO vs. PGHY — Risk / Return Rank
QGRO
PGHY
QGRO vs. PGHY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QGRO | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.03 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.52 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.27 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 2.48 | -1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.78 | 9.56 | -7.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QGRO | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 1.49 | -1.03 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | 0.83 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.61 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.60 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
QGRO vs. PGHY - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRO drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, which is greater than PGHY's maximum drawdown of -20.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRO and PGHY.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRO | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.56% | -20.50% | -12.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -3.04% | -10.50% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.82% | -5.03% | -18.79% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.86% | -9.42% | -22.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -20.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -0.80% | -1.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -1.64% | -6.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 0.79% | +3.25% |
Volatility
QGRO vs. PGHY - Volatility Comparison
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF (PGHY) at 2.00%. This indicates that QGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PGHY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QGRO | PGHY | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 2.00% | +2.33% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.03% | 3.73% | +8.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.58% | 5.06% | +10.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.09% | 5.45% | +15.64% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 7.04% | +15.89% |
QGRO vs. PGHY - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is lower than PGHY's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
QGRO vs. PGHY - Dividend Comparison
QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than PGHY's 7.11% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
PGHY Invesco Global Short Term High Yield Bond ETF | 7.11% | 7.24% | 7.49% | 7.87% | 5.12% | 5.17% | 5.45% | 5.32% | 5.45% | 5.52% | 6.26% | 4.60% |
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.20% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QGRO and PGHY have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QGRO has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to PGHY (2.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRO dropped -32.56% vs PGHY's -20.50%.
On 5-year performance, QGRO leads with 11.72% vs 4.49% for PGHY. On fees, QGRO is cheaper at 0.29% per year. On volatility, PGHY has been the lower-risk option at 2.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, QGRO has performed better with a 11.72% return vs 4.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
QGRO is cheaper with a 0.29% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for PGHY.
PGHY has the higher dividend yield at 7.11%, compared with 0.20% for QGRO.
QGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while PGHY is High Yield Bonds. QGRO tracks iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR), while PGHY tracks DB Global Short Maturity High Yield Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QGRO and 0.35% for PGHY.
PGHY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.49 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QGRO and PGHY
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer