QGRO vs. DFIV
QGRO (American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF) and DFIV (Dimensional International Value ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - QGRO is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR), while DFIV is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Dimensional. QGRO is passively managed, while DFIV is actively managed. Over the past 3 years, QGRO returned 20.35%/yr vs 23.03%/yr for DFIV. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QGRO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.27%/yr for DFIV.
Performance
QGRO vs. DFIV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGRO achieves a 0.09% return, which is significantly lower than DFIV's 10.17% return.
QGRO
- 1D
- 0.54%
- 1M
- 1.74%
- YTD
- 0.09%
- 6M
- 0.15%
- 1Y
- 7.17%
- 3Y*
- 20.35%
- 5Y*
- 11.72%
- 10Y*
- —
DFIV
- 1D
- 0.38%
- 1M
- -0.58%
- YTD
- 10.17%
- 6M
- 14.07%
- 1Y
- 32.57%
- 3Y*
- 23.03%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QGRO vs. DFIV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.09% | 15.18% | 31.42% | 32.42% | -24.54% | 3.96% |
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 10.17% | 45.36% | 7.26% | 17.75% | -3.70% | 0.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRO and DFIV is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2021 | 0.60 |
The correlation between QGRO and DFIV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.54 to 0.60 - a consistent structural relationship.
QGRO vs. DFIV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QGRO
DFIV
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
QGRO
DFIV
Industrials
QGRO
DFIV
Healthcare
QGRO
DFIV
Consumer Cyclical
QGRO
DFIV
Communication Services
QGRO
DFIV
Financial Services
QGRO
DFIV
Consumer Defensive
QGRO
DFIV
Energy
QGRO
DFIV
Utilities
QGRO
DFIV
Real Estate
QGRO
DFIV
Basic Materials
QGRO
DFIV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QGRO vs. DFIV — Risk / Return Rank
QGRO
DFIV
QGRO vs. DFIV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QGRO | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.89 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.46 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.09 | 1.42 | -0.33 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.53 | 3.39 | -2.86 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.78 | 13.05 | -11.26 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QGRO | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 | 2.36 | -1.89 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.65 | 0.91 | -0.26 |
Drawdowns
QGRO vs. DFIV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRO drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, which is greater than DFIV's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRO and DFIV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRO | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.56% | -25.42% | -7.14% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -9.66% | -3.88% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.82% | -14.72% | -9.10% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.71% | -2.23% | -0.48% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.67% | -4.47% | -3.20% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.04% | 2.50% | +1.54% |
Volatility
QGRO vs. DFIV - Volatility Comparison
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) has a higher volatility of 4.33% compared to Dimensional International Value ETF (DFIV) at 3.83%. This indicates that QGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DFIV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QGRO | DFIV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.33% | 3.83% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.03% | 11.26% | +0.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.58% | 13.91% | +1.67% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.09% | 16.65% | +4.44% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 16.65% | +6.28% |
QGRO vs. DFIV - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than DFIV's 0.27% expense ratio.
Dividends
QGRO vs. DFIV - Dividend Comparison
QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.20%, less than DFIV's 2.59% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DFIV Dimensional International Value ETF | 2.59% | 2.92% | 3.88% | 3.93% | 3.84% | 2.30% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.20% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QGRO and DFIV have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QGRO has higher volatility (4.33%) compared to DFIV (3.83%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRO dropped -32.56% vs DFIV's -25.42%.
On 3-year performance, DFIV leads with 23.03% vs 20.35% for QGRO. On fees, DFIV is cheaper at 0.27% per year. On volatility, DFIV has been the lower-risk option at 3.83%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, DFIV has performed better with a 23.03% return vs 20.35%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
DFIV is cheaper with a 0.27% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for QGRO.
DFIV has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.20% for QGRO.
QGRO is categorized as Large Cap Growth Equities, while DFIV is Foreign Large Cap Equities. They also come from different issuers: American Century and Dimensional. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QGRO and 0.27% for DFIV.
DFIV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.36 vs 0.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QGRO and DFIV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer