QGRO vs. BBUS
QGRO (American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF) and BBUS (JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds - QGRO tracks the iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR) while BBUS tracks the Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, QGRO returned 12.22%/yr vs 13.43%/yr for BBUS. Their correlation of 0.91 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QGRO charges 0.29%/yr vs 0.02%/yr for BBUS.
Performance
QGRO vs. BBUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, QGRO achieves a 2.19% return, which is significantly lower than BBUS's 10.60% return.
QGRO
- 1D
- -0.43%
- 1M
- 4.28%
- YTD
- 2.19%
- 6M
- 2.57%
- 1Y
- 10.81%
- 3Y*
- 21.29%
- 5Y*
- 12.22%
- 10Y*
- —
BBUS
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 5.12%
- YTD
- 10.60%
- 6M
- 10.47%
- 1Y
- 27.47%
- 3Y*
- 22.46%
- 5Y*
- 13.43%
- 10Y*
- —
QGRO vs. BBUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 2.19% | 15.18% | 31.42% | 32.42% | -24.54% | 24.57% | 37.99% | 14.51% |
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 10.60% | 17.77% | 24.89% | 27.20% | -19.46% | 27.13% | 20.69% | 16.53% |
Correlation
The correlation between QGRO and BBUS is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.88 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.90 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.92 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 14, 2019 | 0.91 |
The correlation between QGRO and BBUS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.92 - a consistent structural relationship.
QGRO vs. BBUS - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
QGRO
BBUS
Technology
Industrials
Healthcare
Consumer Cyclical
Communication Services
Financial Services
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Utilities
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Technology
QGRO
BBUS
Industrials
QGRO
BBUS
Healthcare
QGRO
BBUS
Consumer Cyclical
QGRO
BBUS
Communication Services
QGRO
BBUS
Financial Services
QGRO
BBUS
Consumer Defensive
QGRO
BBUS
Energy
QGRO
BBUS
Utilities
QGRO
BBUS
Real Estate
QGRO
BBUS
Basic Materials
QGRO
BBUS
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QGRO vs. BBUS — Risk / Return Rank
QGRO
BBUS
QGRO vs. BBUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) and JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| QGRO | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.62 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.10 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.13 | 1.42 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.80 | 3.00 | -2.20 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.69 | 13.76 | -11.07 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| QGRO | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 2.33 | -1.62 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.58 | 0.79 | -0.21 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.67 | 0.84 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
QGRO vs. BBUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QGRO drawdown since its inception was -32.56%, smaller than the maximum BBUS drawdown of -35.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRO and BBUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QGRO | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -32.56% | -35.35% | +2.79% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -13.54% | -9.21% | -4.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.82% | -19.01% | -4.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -31.86% | -25.46% | -6.40% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.67% | -0.74% | +0.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.68% | -5.46% | -2.22% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | 2.00% | +2.03% |
Volatility
QGRO vs. BBUS - Volatility Comparison
American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF (QGRO) has a higher volatility of 3.38% compared to JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF (BBUS) at 2.88%. This indicates that QGRO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BBUS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QGRO | BBUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.38% | 2.88% | +0.50% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.71% | 8.96% | +2.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.33% | 11.87% | +3.46% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.06% | 17.03% | +4.03% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.93% | 19.59% | +3.34% |
QGRO vs. BBUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
QGRO has a 0.29% expense ratio, which is higher than BBUS's 0.02% expense ratio.
Dividends
QGRO vs. BBUS - Dividend Comparison
QGRO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.19%, less than BBUS's 0.98% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BBUS JP Morgan Betabuilders U.S. Equity ETF | 0.98% | 1.07% | 1.21% | 1.38% | 1.57% | 1.11% | 1.43% | 1.37% | 0.00% |
QGRO American Century STOXX U.S. Quality Growth ETF | 0.19% | 0.25% | 0.25% | 0.41% | 0.46% | 0.31% | 0.22% | 0.38% | 0.13% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QGRO and BBUS have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QGRO has higher volatility (3.38%) compared to BBUS (2.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QGRO dropped -32.56% vs BBUS's -35.35%.
On 5-year performance, BBUS leads with 13.43% vs 12.22% for QGRO. On fees, BBUS is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, BBUS has been the lower-risk option at 2.88%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, BBUS has performed better with a 13.43% return vs 12.22%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
BBUS is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for QGRO.
BBUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.98%, compared with 0.19% for QGRO.
QGRO tracks iSTOXX American Century USA Quality Growth (USD)(GR), while BBUS tracks Morningstar US Target Market Exposure Index. They also come from different issuers: American Century and JPMorgan. Their fees differ too: 0.29% for QGRO and 0.02% for BBUS.
BBUS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.33 vs 0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for QGRO and BBUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer