PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QGRD vs. SPYH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QGRD vs. SPYH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF (QGRD) and NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QGRD achieves a 11.56% return, which is significantly higher than SPYH's 3.58% return.


QGRD

1D
0.61%
1M
-1.23%
YTD
11.56%
6M
9.97%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

SPYH

1D
-0.05%
1M
-1.76%
YTD
3.58%
6M
2.67%
1Y
14.40%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QGRD vs. SPYH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between QGRD and SPYH is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 10, 2025

0.89

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QGRD vs. SPYH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QGRD

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


SPYH
SPYH Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
SPYH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYH Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYH Omega Ratio Rank: 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5656
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYH Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QGRD vs. SPYH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Horizon NASDAQ-100 Defined Risk ETF (QGRD) and NEOS S&P 500 Hedged Equity Income ETF (SPYH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


QGRDSPYHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.33

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.98

QGRD vs. SPYH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

QGRD vs. SPYH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QGRD drawdown since its inception was -9.41%, which is greater than SPYH's maximum drawdown of -7.22%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QGRD and SPYH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QGRDSPYHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-9.41%

-7.22%

-2.19%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.19%

-2.42%

-0.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.21%

-0.76%

-1.45%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.31%

Volatility

QGRD vs. SPYH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QGRDSPYHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

6.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.36%

8.23%

+6.13%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

14.36%

12.40%

+1.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.36%

12.40%

+1.96%

QGRD vs. SPYH - Expense Ratio Comparison

QGRD has a 0.85% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYH's 0.68% expense ratio.


Dividends

QGRD vs. SPYH - Dividend Comparison

QGRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.40%, less than SPYH's 7.80% yield.


Frequently Asked Questions


QGRD and SPYH have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, SPYH is cheaper at 0.68% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

SPYH is cheaper with a 0.68% expense ratio, compared with 0.85% for QGRD.

SPYH has the higher dividend yield at 7.80%, compared with 1.40% for QGRD.

They also come from different issuers: Horizon and NEOS. Their fees differ too: 0.85% for QGRD and 0.68% for SPYH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QGRD and SPYH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer