QFRD vs. GARY

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

QFRD (Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF) and GARY (Mango Growth ETF) are both Large Cap Growth Equities funds. QFRD is passively managed, while GARY is actively managed. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. QFRD charges 0.49%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for GARY.

Performance

QFRD vs. GARY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

QFRD

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 3.98%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

GARY

• 1D: -0.11%
• 1M: 2.29%
• 6M: 25.73%
• YTD: 32.07%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QFRD vs. GARY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
QFRD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF	14.34%
GARY Mango Growth ETF	24.92%

Correlation

The correlation between QFRD and GARY is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2026	0.75

Return for Risk

QFRD vs. GARY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF (QFRD) and Mango Growth ETF (GARY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

QFRD vs. GARY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFRD drawdown since its inception was -9.69%, smaller than the maximum GARY drawdown of -10.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFRD and GARY.

Drawdown Indicators

	QFRD	GARY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-9.69%	-10.28%	+0.59%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.81%	-3.75%	+0.94%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-3.34%	-1.84%	-1.50%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	QFRD	GARY	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.74%	21.79%	-2.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.74%	21.79%	-2.05%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.74%	21.79%	-2.05%

QFRD vs. GARY - Expense Ratio Comparison

QFRD has a 0.49% expense ratio, which is lower than GARY's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

QFRD vs. GARY - Dividend Comparison

QFRD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%, more than GARY's 0.04% yield.

Position	TTM	2025
GARY Mango Growth ETF	0.04%	0.05%
QFRD Pacer S&P 500 Quality FCF R&D Leaders ETF	0.11%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both QFRD and GARY in my portfolio?

QFRD and GARY have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, QFRD or GARY?

On fees, QFRD is cheaper at 0.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, QFRD or GARY?

QFRD is cheaper with a 0.49% expense ratio, compared with 0.77% for GARY.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, QFRD or GARY?

QFRD has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.04% for GARY.

What is the main difference between QFRD and GARY?

They also come from different issuers: Pacer and Mango. Their fees differ too: 0.49% for QFRD and 0.77% for GARY.