PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
QFLR vs. TECL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

QFLR vs. TECL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, QFLR achieves a 6.90% return, which is significantly lower than TECL's 125.87% return.


QFLR

1D
0.01%
1M
3.99%
YTD
6.90%
6M
5.88%
1Y
26.98%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

TECL

1D
-2.99%
1M
73.10%
YTD
125.87%
6M
118.69%
1Y
267.85%
3Y*
80.64%
5Y*
43.44%
10Y*
54.49%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

QFLR vs. TECL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
QFLR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF
6.90%17.27%16.64%
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
125.87%38.60%16.17%

Correlation

The correlation between QFLR and TECL is 0.81, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 26, 2024

0.87

The correlation between QFLR and TECL has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.81 to 0.87 - a consistent structural relationship.

QFLR vs. TECL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
QFLR
TECL

Technology

50.8%
20.4%

Communication Services

18.4%

-

Consumer Cyclical

12.1%

-

Consumer Defensive

9.2%

-

Healthcare

3.2%

-

Industrials

2.8%
0.0%

Utilities

1.5%

-

Energy

1.1%
0.0%

Financial Services

0.9%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

QFLR
50.8%
TECL
20.4%

Communication Services

QFLR
18.4%
TECL

-

Consumer Cyclical

QFLR
12.1%
TECL

-

Consumer Defensive

QFLR
9.2%
TECL

-

Healthcare

QFLR
3.2%
TECL

-

Industrials

QFLR
2.8%
TECL
0.0%

Utilities

QFLR
1.5%
TECL

-

Energy

QFLR
1.1%
TECL
0.0%

Financial Services

QFLR
0.9%
TECL

-

Basic Materials

QFLR
0.0%
TECL

-

Real Estate

QFLR

-

TECL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

QFLR vs. TECL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

QFLR
QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7373
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7171
Calmar Ratio Rank
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

TECL
TECL Risk / Return Rank: 8585
Overall Rank
TECL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9696
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TECL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
TECL Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
TECL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
TECL Martin Ratio Rank: 8181
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

QFLR vs. TECL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) and Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


QFLRTECLDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.41

4.35

-1.94

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.26

3.66

-0.40

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.44

1.48

-0.04

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.56

5.79

-2.23

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

15.19

16.63

-1.44

QFLR vs. TECL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current QFLR Sharpe Ratio is 2.41, which is lower than the TECL Sharpe Ratio of 4.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of QFLR and TECL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


QFLRTECLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.41

4.35

-1.94

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.59

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.76

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.40

0.76

+0.63

Drawdowns

QFLR vs. TECL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum QFLR drawdown since its inception was -13.97%, smaller than the maximum TECL drawdown of -77.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFLR and TECL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


QFLRTECLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.97%

-77.96%

+63.99%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.61%

-46.58%

+38.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-66.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-77.96%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-77.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.48%

-2.99%

+2.51%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.50%

-18.38%

+15.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.78%

16.19%

-14.41%

Volatility

QFLR vs. TECL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) is 2.53%, while Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares (TECL) has a volatility of 20.70%. This indicates that QFLR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TECL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


QFLRTECLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.53%

20.70%

-18.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.05%

49.83%

-41.78%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.28%

62.17%

-50.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

12.62%

74.09%

-61.47%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

12.62%

72.35%

-59.73%

QFLR vs. TECL - Expense Ratio Comparison

QFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is lower than TECL's 1.08% expense ratio.


Dividends

QFLR vs. TECL - Dividend Comparison

QFLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TECL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.15%.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020201920182017
QFLR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF
0.00%0.02%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TECL
Direxion Daily Technology Bull 3X Shares
3.15%7.19%0.29%0.28%0.22%0.32%0.52%0.25%0.47%0.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


QFLR and TECL have a correlation of 0.81, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TECL has higher volatility (20.70%) compared to QFLR (2.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, QFLR dropped -13.97% vs TECL's -77.96%.

On 1-year performance, TECL leads with 267.85% vs 26.98% for QFLR. On fees, QFLR is cheaper at 0.89% per year. On volatility, QFLR has been the lower-risk option at 2.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 1-year period, TECL has performed better with a 267.85% return vs 26.98%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

QFLR is cheaper with a 0.89% expense ratio, compared with 1.08% for TECL.

TECL has the higher dividend yield at 3.15%, compared with 0.00% for QFLR.

QFLR is categorized as Nasdaq-100, while TECL is Leveraged Equities. They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for QFLR and 1.08% for TECL.

TECL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.35 vs 2.41), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for QFLR and TECL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer