QFLR vs. QEW
QFLR (Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF) and QEW (Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF) are both Nasdaq-100 funds. QFLR is actively managed, while QEW is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.83 suggests significant overlap in exposure. QFLR charges 0.89%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for QEW.
Performance
QFLR vs. QEW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
QFLR
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- -2.43%
- YTD
- 3.09%
- 6M
- 2.26%
- 1Y
- 19.39%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QEW
- 1D
- -0.17%
- 1M
- 1.82%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QFLR vs. QEW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF | 3.24% |
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 17.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between QFLR and QEW is 0.83, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 18, 2026 | 0.83 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
QFLR vs. QEW — Risk / Return Rank
QFLR
QEW
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QFLR vs. QEW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) and Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF (QEW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| QFLR | QEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.06 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
QFLR vs. QEW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum QFLR drawdown since its inception was -13.97%, which is greater than QEW's maximum drawdown of -5.87%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for QFLR and QEW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| QFLR | QEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.97% | -5.87% | -8.10% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.61% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.02% | -3.20% | -0.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.51% | -1.14% | -1.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | — | — |
Volatility
QFLR vs. QEW - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| QFLR | QEW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.55% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.85% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.76% | 20.25% | -7.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.12% | 20.25% | -7.13% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.12% | 20.25% | -7.13% |
QFLR vs. QEW - Expense Ratio Comparison
QFLR has a 0.89% expense ratio, which is higher than QEW's 0.25% expense ratio.
Dividends
QFLR vs. QEW - Dividend Comparison
QFLR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while QEW's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.11%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
QEW Invesco QQQ Equal Weight ETF | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
QFLR Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.03% |
Frequently Asked Questions
QFLR and QEW have a correlation of 0.83, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QEW is cheaper at 0.25% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QEW is cheaper with a 0.25% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for QFLR.
QEW has the higher dividend yield at 0.11%, compared with 0.00% for QFLR.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.89% for QFLR and 0.25% for QEW.
Find the right allocation for QFLR and QEW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer